Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| |
Authors: | Dirk?Stengel author-information" > author-information__contact u-icon-before" > mailto:dirk.stengel@ukb.de" title=" dirk.stengel@ukb.de" itemprop=" email" data-track=" click" data-track-action=" Email author" data-track-label=" " >Email author,Kai?Bauwens,Axel?Ekkernkamp,J?rg?Cramer |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Friedrich Loeffler Str. 23b, 17489 Greifswald, Germany;(2) Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Trauma Centre, Warener Str. 7, 12683 Berlin, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Introduction The reputation of total ankle arthroplasty for treating end-stage ankle arthritis of different origin is dubious. Newer generation meniscal-bearing prostheses may have overcome the known problems with earlier implants. There is, however, no systematic approach to the available scientific evidence allowing for a critical appraisal of their benefits and risks.Materials and methods We conducted a systematic review meta-analysis of studies exploring the efficacy of three-component total ankle prostheses. We demanded a minimum sample size of 20 subjects, at least 1 year of follow-up, and a clinically relevant study endpoint (for example, results of ankle scoring, ranges of motion [ROM], complications, and survival rates). We identified citations by electronic medical databases and a manual search. We made no restrictions for language. We used an eight-point quality scale to appraise methodological standards, and modeled outcomes by random-effects meta-regression analysis.Results Eighteen of 1830 citations including 1086 patients fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Studies met a median of four quality items (interquartile range 2–5). Outcome estimates did not depend on methodological quality. There was no evidence of strong heterogeneity or publication bias. With standardized 100-point ankle and hindfoot scores, formal data pooling was possible for 10 trials ( n =497), showing a mean improvement of 45.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.3–51.1). Overall ROM improved slightly (6.3°, 95%CI 2.2–10.5°). Weighted complication rates ranged from 1.6% (deep infections) to 14.7% (impingement). Secondary surgery had to be performed in 12.5%, whereas secondary arthrodesis was necessary in 6.3%. The weighted 5-year prosthesis survival rate averaged 90.6%.Conclusions Ankle arthroplasty improves pain and joint mobility in end-stage ankle arthritis. Its performance in comparison to the current reference standard (that is, ankle fusion) remains to be defined in a properly designed randomized trial. |
| |
Keywords: | Total ankle replacement Arthroplasty Ankle arthritis Meta-analysis Efficacy |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|