Quantification of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation Using Jet Centerline Velocities: An In Vitro Study of Jets in an Ambient Counterflow

A method for quantifying mitral and tricuspid regurgitant volume that utilizes a measure of jet orifice velocity U(0) - m/sec), a distal centerline velocity (U(m) - m/sec), and the intervening distance (X - cm) was recently developed; where jet flow rate (Q(cal) - L/min) is calculated as Q(cal) = (U(m)X)(2)/(26.46U(o)). This method, however, modeled the regurgitant jet as a free jet, whereas many atrial jets are counterflowing jets because of jet opposing intra-atrial flow fields (counterflows). This study concentrated on the feasibility of using the free jet quantification equation in the atrium where ambient flow fields may alter jet centerline velocities and reduce the accuracy of jet flow rate calculations. A 4-cm wide chamber was used to pump counterflows of 0, 4, and 22 cm/sec against jets of 2.3, 4.8, and 6.4 m/sec originating from a 2-mm diameter orifice. For each counterflow-jet combination, jet centerline velocities were measured using laser Doppler anemometry. For free jets (no counterflow), flow rate was calculated with 98% mean accuracy. For all jets in counterflow, the calculation was less accurate as: (i) the ratio of jet orifice velocity to counterflow velocity decreased (U(o)/U(c), where U(c) is counterflow velocity), i.e., the counterflow was relatively more intense, and (ii) centerline measurements were made further from the orifice. But although counterflow lowered jet centerline velocities beneath free jet values, it did so only significantly in the jet's distal portion (X/D > 16, i.e., >16 orifice diameters from the origin of the jet). Thus, the initial portion (X/D < 16) of a jet in counterflow behaved essentially as a free jet. As a result, even in significant counterflow, jet flow rate was calculated with >93% accuracy and >85% for jets typical of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, respectively. Counterflow lowers jet centerline velocities beneath equivalent free jet values. This effect, however, is most significant in the distal portion of the jet. Therefore, regurgitant jets, although not classically free because of systolic atrial inflow or jet-induced intra-atrial swirling flows, will decay in their initial portions as free jets and thus are candidates for quantification with the centerline technique. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 13, July 1996)