首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Isolated lumbar extensor strengthening versus regular physical therapy in an army working population with nonacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
Authors:Helmhout Pieter H  Harts Chris C  Viechtbauer Wolfgang  Staal J Bart  de Bie Rob A
Affiliation:a Department of Training Medicine and Training Physiology, Personnel Command, Royal Netherlands Army, Utrecht, The Netherlands
b Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
c Department of Epidemiology and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Abstract:Helmhout PH, Harts CC, Viechtbauer W, Staal JB, de Bie RA. Isolated lumbar extensor strengthening versus regular physical therapy in an army working population with nonacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of specific lumbar extensor training compared with regular physical therapy (PT) in workers with nonspecific nonacute low back pain (LBP).

Design

A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

Setting

PT department in (military primary care) health centers.

Participants

Predominantly male soldiers (N=129) with 4 weeks or more of low back complaints who were referred by the health center's general practitioner for PT (mean age, 35.9±10.8y; range, 20-56y), of whom 127 randomized participants were included in the analyses. One patient withdrew because of adverse effects during treatment.

Interventions

Participants were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment programs: (1) a 10-week device-supported isolated lumbar extension training, twice a week, or (2) regular PT, mainly consisting of exercise therapy and aerobic activities.

Main Outcome Measures

Functional status (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Patient-Specific Functional Scale) and global perceived effect were assessed in the short term (5wk, 10wk) and long term (6mo, 12mo).

Results

Both groups showed a favorable development in main outcomes over time: short-term improvements (after 10 weeks of treatment) remained stable or even slightly increased throughout the 12-month follow-up. No significant differences between the 2 groups were shown for any of the outcome measures, at any time.

Conclusions

Consistent with prior evidence, specific back strengthening does not seem to offer incremental benefits in LBP management compared with regular PT care that mainly consists of general exercise therapy. (ISRCTN identifier ISRCTN19334317.)
Keywords:Exercise   Low back pain   Rehabilitation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号