Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate and compare laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging with conventional laparotomy for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: From July 2001 to December 2003, a retrospective review of patients with endometrial carcinoma was carried out. The medical records of those patients who had undergone surgical staging with hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLN) were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were operating time (OT), estimated blood loss, total number of lymph nodes yielded, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULT: A total of 64 cases were identified. Two cases were excluded because of incomplete records. Two cases with para-aortic lymphadenectomy and four cases with Wertheim's hysterectomy were excluded from the study. Thirty-six patients underwent laparotomy with total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and PLN (laparotomy group). Twenty patients underwent the same surgery by laparoscopy, of which 19 were successfully carried out (laparoscopy group). One case was converted to laparotomy. The mean OT in the laparoscopy group was longer when compared with the laparotomy group (211 min vs 94 min, P < 0.001). The mean estimated blood loss in the laparoscopy group was less (200 mL vs 513 mL, P < 0.001). The post-operative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopy group (3.6 days vs 7.7 days, P < 0.001). The mean number of lymph nodes yielded was more in the laparoscopy group (26.1 vs 16.7, P = 0.004). Neither group had intraoperative complications and both had similar postoperative complication rates. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma is associated with significantly less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, longer OT time, and more lymph nodes yielded when compared with laparotomy.