腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除与开腹全子宫切除的临床对比

目的:研究腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除与开腹全子宫切除的临床疗效。方法:取本院子宫肌瘤患者104例为研究对象,随机分观察组(腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术)与对照组(开腹全子宫切除术)各52例,比较手术指标与并发症。结果:与对照组比较,观察组出血量少,手术时间、肛门排气与住院时间均较短,观察组并发症率(3.84%)较对照组(15.38%)低,P<0.05(具统计学差异)。结论:与开腹全子宫切除比较,对子宫肌瘤患者采用腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术治疗能缩短手术、肛门排气与住院时间,减少出血量与并发症。

Clinical Comparison of Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Open Hysterectomy

Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and open hysterectomy. Methods: 104 patients with uterine fibroids in our hospital were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly divided into the study group(laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and the control group(open hysterectomy), 52 cases were compared. Surgery index and concurrent disease. Results: Compared with the control group, the study group had less bleeding, and the operation time, anal exhaust and hospitalization time were shorter. The complication rate of the study group(3.84%) was lower than that of the control group(15.38%), P<0.05(with statistics). Learning differences). Conclusion: Compared with open hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy for patients with uterine fibroids can shorten the time of surgery, anal exhaust and hospitalization, reduce the amount of bleeding and complications.