开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肾上腺肿瘤的效果的meta分析

目的通过对开放性手术与腹腔镜手术在治疗肾上腺肿瘤效果的系统评价，比较两种方法的有效性与安全性。方法计算机检索CNKI，PUBMED，SinoMed，EBSCO，Springerlink，万方医学网，维普数据库等相关数据库，全面收集1999年~2016年发表的相关文献，对文章进行筛选、评价以及提取相关资料，运用RevMan5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果纳入的25篇文章，共有2340 例患者，Meta 分析结果显示，在术后肠功能恢复时间[OR=-0.96，95%CI（-1.22，-0.70）P<0.00 001]，住院时间[OR=-3.48，95%CI（-4.13，-2.78）P<0.00 001]，术后并发症[OR=0.22，95%CI（0.14，0.35）P<0.00 001]，术中出血量（OR=-104.77，95%CI（-138.95，-70.60）P<0.00 001）方面腹腔镜手术优于开放性手术；在手术时间、手术费用的比较中，两组差异没有统计学意义。结论腹腔镜手术在术后肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、术后并发症和术中出血上优于开放性手术，但在手术时间、手术花费方面差异不明显。

Comparison of open versus laparoscopic surgeries for adrenal tumor: a meta-analysis

Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of open and laparoscopic surgeries for treatment ofadrenal tumors. Methods The online databases including CNKI, PUBMED, SinoMed, EBSCO, Springerlink, WanFang Data,and VIP were searched for clinical trials published from 1999 to 2016. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2software. Results A total of 2340 patients in 25 trials were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that laparoscopicsurgery was better than open surgery in terms of intestinal function recovery time (OR=-0.96, 95%CI [-1.22, -0.70] P<0.000 01),hospitalization time (OR=-3.48, 95%CI [-4.13, -2.78], P<0.000 01), complications (OR=0.22, 95%CI [0.14, 0.35], P<0.0001), andvolume of blood loss (OR=-104.77, 95%CI [-138.95, -70.60], P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in the surgery costbetween open and laparoscopic surgeries. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery for treatment ofadrenal tumors for shorter intestinal function recovery time, surgery duration, and hospitalization time and less complicationsand blood loss.