首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

4种营养状况评价方法的比较及意义
引用本文:彭景,周静. 4种营养状况评价方法的比较及意义[J]. 中国校医, 2003, 17(5): 395-397
作者姓名:彭景  周静
作者单位:广州体育学院 广州510075;
摘    要:目的 分析比较身高标准体重法、离差法、体质指数、体质指数校正法等四种方法在大学生营养评价中的意义。 方法 随机抽取 187名大学生 ,用四种方法对其营养状况进行评价 ,结果用单因素卡方分析法和Ridit分析法比较。 结果 用四种方法评价同一群体大学生的营养状况时 ,其结果的差异有显著意义。 结论 作为 18~ 2 2岁的大学生 ,以身高标准体重法的评价结果更为客观 ;由于这一年龄段的发育水平影响其评价结果 ,因此 ,以发育水平分组评价时 ,可能更有意义

关 键 词:营养评价  身高标准体重法  离差法  体质指数  体质指数校正法  
文章编号:1001-7062(2003)05-0395-03
修稿时间:2003-07-09

Comparison of four nutritional assessment methods
PENG Jing,ZHOU Jing.College of Tourism and Cuisine,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,,China. Comparison of four nutritional assessment methods[J]. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2003, 17(5): 395-397
Authors:PENG Jing  ZHOU Jing.College of Tourism  Cuisine  Yangzhou University  Yangzhou    China
Affiliation:PENG Jing,ZHOU Jing.College of Tourism and Cuisine,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,225001,China
Abstract:Objective This study was designed to evaluate the significance ofdifferent nutritional assessments. Methods 187 college students were randomly collected,and assessed by standerd weight and height method,deviation method,body mass index and adjustment of body mass index.Analysis data by single agent calorie the square and Ridit method. Results There are obvious differences between the data in assessed by diffeIent nutritional assessment. Conclusion The conclusion of this study indicate that assessment of weight and high methodis more reliable then others to college students,and if they were defined by the level of growth and development,the conclusion of the study would be more significant.
Keywords:Nutritional Assessment  Standard Weight And Height Method  Deviation Method  Body Mass Index  Adjustment Method of Body Mass Index
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国校医》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国校医》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号