首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接重建尿道治疗长段尿道狭窄
引用本文:徐月敏,撒应龙,傅强,张炯,谢弘,胡晓勇,宋鲁杰. 舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接重建尿道治疗长段尿道狭窄[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2008, 29(6)
作者姓名:徐月敏  撒应龙  傅强  张炯  谢弘  胡晓勇  宋鲁杰
作者单位:上海交通大学附属第六人民医院泌尿外科,200233
摘    要:目的 探讨舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接尿道成形治疗多节段或长段尿道狭窄的安全性和治疗效果.方法 尿道狭窄患者11例,年龄24~56岁,平均32岁.其中前尿道长段狭窄7例,狭窄长度10~15 cm,平均12 cm;尿道2~3处狭窄4例.病程6个月~8年.取舌黏膜条与颊黏膜条拼接尿道成形治疗7例,舌黏膜条与包皮瓣拼接尿道成形治疗4例.结果 11例手术顺利.1例舌黏膜与包皮拼接尿道成形患者术后3个月并发尿道外口狭窄,经手术矫正后排尿通畅,术后8个月最大尿流率27.5 ml/s.余10例排尿通畅、尿线粗,术后随访5~12个月,平均10个月,最大尿流率21~36 ml/s,平均26.8 ml/s.结论 舌黏膜与颊黏膜或包皮拼接尿道成形具有取材方便、患者创伤小的特占点,是治疗长段尿道律窄的较好术式.尤其适用于尿道多处狭窄者.

关 键 词:舌黏膜  颊黏膜  包皮  尿道狭窄  尿道成形

Combined lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa or foreskin urethroplasty for the treatment of long or multi-segment urethral stricture
XU Yue-min,SA Ying-long,FU Qiang,ZHANG Jiong,XIE Hong,HU Xiao-yong,SONG Lu-jie. Combined lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa or foreskin urethroplasty for the treatment of long or multi-segment urethral stricture[J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2008, 29(6)
Authors:XU Yue-min  SA Ying-long  FU Qiang  ZHANG Jiong  XIE Hong  HU Xiao-yong  SONG Lu-jie
Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of using combined lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa onlay grafts or foreskin flap urethroptasty for the treatment of long or multi-seg-ment urethral strictures. Methods Seven patients with long and 4 cases with multi segment urethral strictures(range 10 to 15 cm,mean 12)underwent substitution urethroplasty using combined lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa onlay grafts or foreskin flap urethroplasty.The patients'age ranged 24 to 56,mean 32 and the course of disease was from 6 to 96 months.Of the 11 patients 7 underwent com-bined lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa grafts urethroptasty,4 patients underwent combined lingual mucosa graft and foreskin flap Urethroplasty. Results The patients were followed up 5-1 2(mean 10)months postoperatively. Meatal stenosis developed 3 months postoperatively in 1 patient who un-derwent combined lingual mucosa and foreskin flap urethroplasty.The patient could void well after re-operation.The other patients could void well and the peak flow rate ranged from 2 1 to 3 6 ml/s(mean 26.8 ml/s). Conclusions Combined lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa onlay grafts or foreskin flap substitution urethroplasty may have the advantage of easier harvest,less trauma.It could be a good U- rethral substitution technique for the treatment of long or multi-segment urethral stricture.
Keywords:Lingual mucosa  Buccal mucosa  Foreskin flap  Urethral stricture  Ureasty
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号