Inter-rater reliability of McKenzie assessment in patients with neck pain |
| |
Authors: | Carol P Dionne Ronald F Bybee Joe Tomaka |
| |
Institution: | aOklahoma University Health Sciences Center, College of Allied Health, Oklahoma University, OK 73104, USA;bAngelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA;cUniversity of Texas-El Paso, College of Health Sciences, El Paso, TX, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesTo determine inter-rater agreement on diagnostic category using the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) classification system for neck pain. If the diagnostic category was derangement syndrome, inter-rater agreement on the subcategory and the directional preference of treatment was also determined.DesignClinicians viewed videotaped MDT examinations of 20 patients with neck pain and rated the MDT diagnosis independently for each patient. If the diagnostic category was derangement syndrome, the subcategory and directional preference of treatment were also rated.SettingPrivate physical therapy outpatient clinics and a university clinical laboratory.ParticipantsFifty-four clinicians trained in MDT for neck pain from the USA and Canada, and 20 adult patients with neck pain.Main outcome measuresInter-rater agreement for MDT diagnosis, derangement subcategory and directional preference of treatment was determined using Kappa and percentage agreement.ResultsOverall, agreement was of moderate clinical significance for diagnosis κ = 0.55, P < 0.001, confidence intervals (CI) 0.52 to 0.58, 67%], derangement subcategory (κ = 0.47, CI 0.44 to 0.50, P < 0.001; 63%) and directional preference of treatment (κ = 0.46, CI 0.43 to 0.49, P < 0.05; 70%).ConclusionsClinicians trained in MDT for neck pain demonstrate moderate agreement when classifying the diagnostic category and treatment for neck pain. |
| |
Keywords: | Reliability Diagnosis Treatment Neck pain |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|