首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效与不愈合危险因素分析
引用本文:马志华,付宏伟,陈晓华. 闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效与不愈合危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 211-215. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.17
作者姓名:马志华  付宏伟  陈晓华
作者单位:青海省第五人民医院骨科, 西宁 810007
摘    要:目的 评估闭合复位髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干骨折合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效并分析造成骨折不愈合的危险因素。 方法 回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年12月在我院行闭合复位髓内固定治疗同侧股骨干骨折合并髋部骨折的31例患者,男23例,女8例,年龄(46.4±15.7) 岁(21~73岁)。观察并记录股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折患者阻挡钉数量、手术时间、失血量、愈合时间、肢体短缩、髋关节HHS功能评分。对可能造成骨折不愈合的可能因素进行单因素及多因素分析。 结果 所有患者随访时间12~48个月,平均随访时间20.1个月。对所有造成骨折不愈合的可能因素进行分析。阻挡钉数量和骨折类型具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余因素如损伤机制、手术时间等未见明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。对上述两因素进行多因素分析,阻挡钉数量(OR=2.845, 95% CI 2.164~3.741)和骨折类型(OR=3.388,95% CI 1.966~5.840)为独立危险因素。 结论 阻挡钉数量少、股骨干粉碎型骨折是引起骨折不愈合的独立危险因素。闭合复位髓内钉治疗同侧股骨干合并股骨粗隆间骨折安全有效、可提高生活质量,值得临床广泛推广。

关 键 词:髓内钉   股骨干骨折   股骨粗隆间骨折  
收稿时间:2020-05-14

Analysis of clinical efficacy and nonunion risk factors of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture
Ma Zhihua,Fu Hongwei,Chen Xiaohua. Analysis of clinical efficacy and nonunion risk factors of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(2): 211-215. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.2.17
Authors:Ma Zhihua  Fu Hongwei  Chen Xiaohua
Affiliation:Department of Orthopedics, the Fifth People's Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining 810007, Qinghai Province, China 
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of closed reduction intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture with intertrochanteric fracture and to analyze the risk factors for fracture nonunion. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 31 patients (23 males and 8 females, aged from 21 to 73 years old who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary fixation for ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture with intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. The intramedullary nail type, number of blocking nails, operation time, blood loss, healing time, limb shortening and hip joint HHS function score in femoral shaft patients with intertrochanteric fractures were observed and recorded. The possible factors of fracture nonunion were analyzed by single factor and multiple factors. Results All patients were followed up for 12 to 48 months, with an average of 20.1 months. Possible causes of fracture nonunion were analyzed. There were statistical significance in the number of blocking nails and fracture type (P<0.05), while there was no statistical significance in other factors such as injury mechanism, and operation time (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis was conducted for the above two factors. The number of blocking nails (OR=2.845, 95% CI 2.164-3.741) and fracture type (OR=3.388, 95% CI 1.966~5.840) were the independent risk factors. Conclusions The independent risk factors of fracture nonunion are the small number of blocking nails and the comminuted fracture of femoral shaft. Closed reduction intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft with intertrochanteric fracture is safe and effective and can improve the quality of life.
Keywords:   Intramedullary nail   Femoral shaft fracture   Intertrochanteric fracture  
点击此处可从《中国临床解剖学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国临床解剖学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号