Neurophysiological evidence for the validity of verbal strategy reports in mental arithmetic |
| |
Authors: | Grabner Roland H De Smedt Bert |
| |
Institution: | a Institute for Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 41, UNO C15, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland b Department of Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 2, Leuven, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | Behavioral research has shown that arithmetic problems (e.g., 6 + 2=) are solved with various strategies, which can be inferred from the size of the presented problems or from trial-by-trial verbal strategy reports. The validity of these verbal strategy reports, however, has been repeatedly questioned. In the present electroencephalography study, we compared the association of both approaches with the oscillatory brain responses during arithmetic problem solving. Nineteen adults solved small and large addition and subtraction problems and indicated the applied strategy (fact retrieval vs. procedure use) on a trial-by-trial basis by means of verbal strategy reports. Analysis of event-related (de-)synchronization (ERS/ERD) in theta and alpha frequencies revealed a general convergence of verbal strategy reports and the problem size approach, with fact retrieval being accompanied by higher left-hemispheric theta ERS, and procedural strategies being reflected in higher widespread ERD in the lower alpha band and bilateral parietooccipital ERD in the upper alpha band. A direct comparison of the neurophysiological data from both approaches suggests a higher sensitivity of verbal strategy reports to problem solving strategies applied in mental arithmetic, particularly for large problems. Taken together, the current data provide the first neurophysiological evidence for the validity of verbal strategy reports. |
| |
Keywords: | Arithmetic Problem-solving strategies Verbal strategy reports Problem size Fact retrieval Oscillatory EEG ERD ERS |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|