首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessing physical function and activity for survivors of a critical illness: A review of instruments
Authors:Doug Elliott PhD  RN  Linda Denehy PhD  BAppSc   Sue Berney PhD BPhysio  Jennifer A. Alison PhD MSc  Dip Phty
Affiliation:aFaculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia;bMelbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia;cAustin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic,Australia;dDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
Abstract:

Background

Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life are important measures for survivors of a critical illness. Studies have demonstrated debilitating physical effects for a significant proportion of surviving patients, particularly those with intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Contemporary practice changes include a focus on the continuum of critical illness, with less sedation and more physical activity including mobility while in ICU, and post-ICU and post-hospitalisation activities to support optimal recovery. How to best assess the physical function of patients at different phases of their recovery and rehabilitation is therefore important.

Purpose

This narrative review paper examined observational and functional assessment instruments used for assessing patients across the in-ICU, post-ICU and post-hospital continuum of critical illness.

Methods

Relevant papers were identified from a search of bibliographic databases and a review of the reference list of selected articles. The clinimetric properties of physical function and HRQOL measures and their relevance and utility in ICU were reported in narrative format.

Findings

The review highlighted many different instruments used to measure function in survivors of ICU including muscle strength testing, functional tests and walk tests, and patient centred outcomes such as health related quality of life. In general, the sensitivity and validity of these instruments for use with survivors of a critical illness has not yet been established.

Conclusion

Based on findings from the review, screening of patients using reliable and valid instruments for ICU patients is recommended to inform both practice and future studies of interventions aimed at improving recovery and rehabilitation.
Keywords:Physical function   Health-related quality of life   Measuring instruments   Clinical utility
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号