The problems and outcome with newborns who are extremely low birth weight, appropriate for gestational age and small for gestational age

The aim of this study is to evaluate the consequences of being extremely low birth weight (ELBW) under 1000 g at birth, small (SGA) or appropriate for gestational age (AGA). METHODOLOGY: A retrospective comparison of two cohorts of ELBW AGA (n = 47) and SGA (n = 38) infants, admitted to the Intensive Care Unite of State Maternity Hospital "Ma?chin Dom" from 01, 1995 to 06, 1998 is carried out. Infants with major congenital anomalies and those, who died in the first two hours of life, being extremely premature and unviable, are excluded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The mean birth weight of the AGA group is 863 g, their mean gestational age is 26.6 weeks of gestation and of the SGA group--795 g and 29.6 weeks respectively. In the Sga C-section is preferred in 85%, vs only 34% in the AGA group. SGA babies are with two times greater survival rate (61%) then AGA (32%). The causes of death are similar. The AGA survivors have a greater rate of stage III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage, more prolonged need for ventilatory support (19 vs 12 days for SGA) and oxygen supplementation (37.5 vs 30.7 for the SGA), more difficulties with enteral feeding and their median hospital stay is somewhat longer (81.9 days), compared with those of the SGA (76.6 days). The two groups show a similar rate of respiratory distress syndrome, chronic lung disease, infections and neurological complications among the survivors.