大肠杆菌表达的人源性抗CTLA4单链抗体三种复性方法比较

比较表达于大肠杆菌中的人源性抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原4单链抗体(A n ti-CTLA 4 scFv)的三种体外复性方法的复性效率。稀释、透析和亲和柱上三种复性方式复性A n ti-CTLA 4 scFv,采用B rad ford法分析蛋白复性得率,采用间接细胞EL ISA法检测所得蛋白的活性。透析复性蛋白得率最高,稀释复性蛋白得率其次,亲和柱上复性蛋白得率最低;透析复性所得蛋白结合活性是稀释复性的1.95倍,是亲和柱上复性所得蛋白活性的4.13倍(无谷胱甘肽氧化还原对G SH/G SSH)及3.63倍(有G SH/G SSH)。结论:采用含0.15 m o l/L N aC、l1 mm o l/L G SSH和3 mm o l/L G SH的50 mm o l/L T ris-HC l(pH 8.0)缓冲液作为A n ti-CTLA 4 scFv的复性液,4℃下透析复性48 h,可获得较高复性得率和结合活性。

Evaluation of Three In-Vitro Refolding Methods for Human-derived Anti-CTLA4 scFv Expressed in E.coli

To evaluate the efficiency of three in vitro refolding methods for a humanized single-chain Fv antibody against human CTLA4(CD152) expressed in E. coli, the denatured and purified inclusion bodies (IBS) were refolded by dilution, dialysis and in situ refolding via Immobilized Metal-Ion-Affinity Chromatography (IMAC), respectively. The concentration of refolded scFvs was examined by Bradford method. And the antigen binding activity of the refolded scFvs was analyzed by indirect cell-ELISA. The highest and lowest refolding yields could be obtained by dialysis and in situ refolding via IMAC, respectively. The binding activity of the refolded scFv by dialysis was 1.95-fold higher than that by dilution, 4.13-fold higher than that by in situ refolding via IMAC (GSH/GSSH excluded) and 3.63-fold higher than that by in situ refolding via IMAC (GSH/GSSH included), respectively. In conclusion, a high refolding yield and binding activity of scFv with natural conformation could be obtained by dialysis in the condition of 0. 15 mol/L sodium chloride, 50 mmol/L Tirs-HCl, pH 8. 0 buffer containing 3 mmol/L reduced glutathione and 1 mmol/L oxidized glutathione for 48 hours at 4 degrees C.