Partner choice and fidelity stabilize coevolution in a Cretaceous-age defensive symbiosis

Many insects rely on symbiotic microbes for survival, growth, or reproduction. Over evolutionary timescales, the association with intracellular symbionts is stabilized by partner fidelity through strictly vertical symbiont transmission, resulting in congruent host and symbiont phylogenies. However, little is known about how symbioses with extracellular symbionts, representing the majority of insect-associated microorganisms, evolve and remain stable despite opportunities for horizontal exchange and de novo acquisition of symbionts from the environment. Here we demonstrate that host control over symbiont transmission (partner choice) reinforces partner fidelity between solitary wasps and antibiotic-producing bacteria and thereby stabilizes this Cretaceous-age defensive mutualism. Phylogenetic analyses show that three genera of beewolf wasps (Philanthus, Trachypus, and Philanthinus) cultivate a distinct clade of Streptomyces bacteria for protection against pathogenic fungi. The symbionts were acquired from a soil-dwelling ancestor at least 68 million years ago, and vertical transmission via the brood cell and the cocoon surface resulted in host–symbiont codiversification. However, the external mode of transmission also provides opportunities for horizontal transfer, and beewolf species have indeed exchanged symbiont strains, possibly through predation or nest reuse. Experimental infection with nonnative bacteria reveals that—despite successful colonization of the antennal gland reservoirs—transmission to the cocoon is selectively blocked. Thus, partner choice can play an important role even in predominantly vertically transmitted symbioses by stabilizing the cooperative association over evolutionary timescales.Cooperation is ubiquitous in nature, yet it presents a conundrum to evolutionary biology because acts that are beneficial to the receiver but costly to the actor should not be favored by natural selection (1). In interspecific associations (i.e., symbioses), the two most important models to explain the maintenance of cooperation are partner fidelity and partner choice (2, 3). In partner-fidelity associations, host and symbiont interact repeatedly and reward cooperating individuals while punishing cheaters, thereby reinforcing mutually beneficial interactions (2, 4). In partner-choice associations, individuals may interact only once, but one member can select its partner in advance of any possible exploitation (2, 4). Partner choice appears to select for cooperative strains among environmentally acquired microbial symbionts, e.g., the bioluminescent Vibrio fischeri bacteria of squids (5), the nitrogen-fixing rhizobia of legumes (6), and mycorrhizal fungi of plants (7). By contrast, partner fidelity is generally assumed to be the major stabilizing force in the widespread and ecologically important vertically transmitted symbioses of insects (4).However, localization and transmission routes of mutualistic bacteria in insects are diverse, and the differences across symbiotic systems have important implications for the evolutionary trajectory of the associations. Symbionts with an obligate intracellular lifestyle are usually tightly integrated into the host’s metabolism (e.g., ref. 8) and development (9), and the mutual interdependence of both partners coincides with perfect vertical symbiont transmission. Over evolutionary timescales, the high degree of partner fidelity results in host–symbiont cocladogenesis, and, concordantly, phylogenies of hosts and their intracellular symbionts are often found to be congruent (10–13). Although such a pattern is also observed for some extracellular symbioses with especially tight host–symbiont integration (14, 15), the ability of many extracellularly transmitted symbionts to spend part of their life cycle outside of the host’s body is often reflected in more or less extensive horizontal transmission or de novo acquisition of symbionts from the environment (16, 17). In these cases, partner choice mechanisms are expected to ensure specificity in the establishment and maintenance of the association (18). The nature of such control mechanisms, however, remains poorly understood.Although many of the well-studied mutualistic associations in insects have a nutritional basis (19, 20), an increasing number of symbioses for the defense of the host against predators (21), parasitoids (22), or pathogens (23–25) have recently been discovered. Among defensive symbionts, Actinobacteria are particularly prevalent, probably due to their ubiquity in the soil and their ability to produce secondary metabolites with antibiotic properties (23). Antibiotic-producing actinobacterial symbionts have been discovered on the cuticle of leaf-cutting ants (26), in the fungal galleries of a bark beetle (27), and in the antennae and on cocoons of beewolf wasps (28). While in the former two cases the symbionts have been implicated in the defense of the hosts’ nutritional resources against competing fungi (26, 27), the beewolves’ bacteria protect the offspring in the cocoon against pathogenic microorganisms (28, 29).Beewolves are solitary wasps in the genera Philanthus, Trachypus, and Philanthinus (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae, Philanthini). They engage in a defensive alliance with the Actinobacterium ‘Candidatus Streptomyces philanthi’ (CaSP) (28, 30, 31), which is cultivated by female beewolves in specialized antennal gland reservoirs (32). The uniqueness and complexity of the glands suggest a long history of host adaptation towards cultivating its actinobacterial symbionts (32). From the antennae, the streptomycetes are secreted into the brood cell, taken up by the larva, and incorporated into its cocoon (33), where they provide protection against pathogenic fungi and bacteria (28) by producing at least nine different antimicrobial compounds (29). Weeks or months later, eclosing adult females acquire the bacteria from the cocoon surface (33), thus completing the vertical transmission of CaSP. However, this mode of transmission provides opportunities for the horizontal transfer of symbionts among beewolf species or the de novo uptake of bacteria from the environment. Despite these opportunities, a monophyletic clade of CaSP strains has previously been found in 31 species of beewolves, suggesting an ancient and highly coevolved relationship (30, 31, 34).Here we combine cophylogenetic analyses of beewolves and their vertically transmitted defensive symbionts with experimental manipulation of symbiont infection status and subsequent observations of transmission from female antennal gland reservoirs into the brood cell to (i) reconstruct the coevolutionary history of the symbiosis, (ii) estimate the age of the symbiosis, (iii) elucidate the ancestral lifestyle of the symbionts, and (iv) assess the importance of partner fidelity and partner choice for the long-term stability of the association.