首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床观察
引用本文:唐存亮,王秋红,王润,辛忠,郭润娥,张曼旭,韩维杰,吴迪.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床观察[J].包头医学院学报,2013,29(5):44-46.
作者姓名:唐存亮  王秋红  王润  辛忠  郭润娥  张曼旭  韩维杰  吴迪
作者单位:包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030;包头医学院第二附属医院急诊科,内蒙古,包头,014030
摘    要:目的:对比探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TUSPLC)和传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的优缺点。方法:回顾分析2011年2月至2012年12月包头医学院第二附属医院普外科开展的TUSPLC(1组,n=38)及同期完成的LC(2组,n=38)的临床资料。观察对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、术后是否使用镇痛药物、住院费用及并发症的发生。结果:76例手术均获成功,术后无并发症发生。两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术后肠功能恢复时间及术后镇痛率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:TUSPLC是安全可行的,具有优于传统LC的美容效果以及术后疼痛轻、恢复快等优点。

关 键 词:单孔  腹腔镜  胆囊切除术

Clinical Observation of Transumbilical Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
TANG Cunliang,WANG Qiuhong,WANG Run,XIN Zhong,GUO Run'e,ZHANG Manxu,HAN Weijie,WU Di.Clinical Observation of Transumbilical Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy[J].Journal of Baotou Medical College,2013,29(5):44-46.
Authors:TANG Cunliang  WANG Qiuhong  WANG Run  XIN Zhong  GUO Run'e  ZHANG Manxu  HAN Weijie  WU Di
Institution:( Emergency Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Baotou 014030, China )
Abstract:Objective: To make a comparative study of the advantages and disadvantages in transumbilical single port lapa- roscopic cholecystectomy (TUSPLC) and in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of TUSPLC ( Group 1, n = 38 ) and LC ( group 2, n = 38 ) was made, performed in the General Surgery De- partment of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College from February 2011 to December 2012. An comparative oh- servation was made between the two groups of operation time, operation bleeding volume, postoperative intestinal function recov- ery time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative use of analgesic drugs, the hospitalization cost and postoperative complica- tions. Results : All the 76 cases of operation in both groups attained a success, without postoperative complications. There was no significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ) between the two groups in operation time, operation bleeding volume, postoperative hospi- tal stay, the hospitalization cost and postoperative complications, but with significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ) between the two groups in postoperative intestinal function recovery time and postoperative analgesia rate. Conclusion: The transumbilical single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUSPLC) is feasible, safe and superior to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( LC ), with better cosmetic results, less postoperative pain and sooner recovery.
Keywords:Single port  Laparoscopy  Cholecystectomy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号