Comparison of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis after renal transplant failure

Background. A growing number of patients are returning to dialysisafter renal transplant failure. The aim of this study is todetermine whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a safe and goodtreatment option for these patients. Methods. All patients returning to PD or haemodialysis (HD)after renal transplant failure before 1 October 2002 at theUniversity Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, were evaluated.Data were collected until death, retransplantation (reTx), transferto HD or PD or until 1 January 2003. Results. Twenty-one patients starting PD (PDpostTx-group) and39 patients starting HD (HDpostTx-group) after renal transplantfailure were included in the study. There were no significantdifferences in age, sex, serum albumin- and CRP-levels at baseline.The total time on renal replacement therapy at transplant failureand time to transplant failure did not differ between the twogroups either. Furthermore, the baseline comorbidity was similarin both groups. During follow-up, the outcome did not differsignificantly between the two groups. However, there was a tendencytowards higher patient survival and reTx tended to be more frequentin the PDpostTx-group. Moreover, patients in the HDpostTx-grouptended to accrue more new comorbidity. The incidence of peritonitisand the evolution of dialysis adequacy (renal and peritonealKt/V and creatinine clearances) with time in the PDpostTx-groupwas similar to that seen in our centre's PD patients who hadnever undergone transplantation before. Conclusions. This study suggests that the outcome in patientsstarting PD after renal transplant failure is at least as goodas the outcome in those starting HD. Although these observationalfindings warrant further confirmation, PD therefore can be regardedas a safe and good treatment option for patients returning todialysis after renal transplant failure.