首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于蒙特卡罗模拟的直肠癌术前容积调强放射治疗计划剂量验证
引用本文:姚凯宁1,岳海振1,王若曦1,王美娇1,弓健1,龚丽青2,张艺宝1,吴昊1. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的直肠癌术前容积调强放射治疗计划剂量验证[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2020, 37(5): 529-534. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.05.001
作者姓名:姚凯宁1  岳海振1  王若曦1  王美娇1  弓健1  龚丽青2  张艺宝1  吴昊1
作者单位:1. 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所放疗科,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京100142;2. 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所营养科,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京100142
摘    要:目的: 通过蒙特卡罗模拟评价基于各向异性解析算法(AAA)直肠癌术前容积调强放射治疗计划(VMAT)的剂量计算精度。方法: 选取20例基于AAA算法和RapidPlan模型优化的直肠癌术前VMAT计划,通过对比蒙卡模拟与治疗计划计算结果的平均DVH、靶区适形度(CI)、靶区均匀性(HI)和Gamma 3D通过率等参数,评估基于AAA算法的VMAT治疗计划剂量计算精度。结果: 两种Gamma 3D评估策略通过率的均值与标准差分别为97.58±0.47%(Max Dose)、92.46±1.76%(Local Dose),且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);对PTV和PGTV的CI、DMin、膀胱的D50%、DMean等不符合正态分布的参数做相关样本非参数检验,除PGTV的CI和Dmin外,差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);其他服从正态分布的参数做配对样本T检验,差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论: Rapidplan模型计划在低剂量区通过率较低,说明AAA算法射野边缘低剂量区计算偏差较大;靶区Dmin与算法的精度较为相关,CI和HI参数相对于蒙卡模拟结果有一定差异;AAA算法在股骨头和膀胱的D50%、DMean相对蒙卡模型有不同程度的低估。

关 键 词:蒙特卡罗模拟  RapidPlan模型  Gamma 3D分析  容积调强放射治疗  各向异性解析算法

Dosimetry Verification of Volume Modulated Radiotherapy Plans for Preoperative Rectal Cancer based on Monte Carlo Simulation
YAO Kaining1,YUE Haizhen1,WANG Ruoxi1,WANG Meijiao1,GONG Jian1,GONG Liqing2,ZHANG Yibao1,WU Hao1. Dosimetry Verification of Volume Modulated Radiotherapy Plans for Preoperative Rectal Cancer based on Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 2020, 37(5): 529-534. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.05.001
Authors:YAO Kaining1  YUE Haizhen1  WANG Ruoxi1  WANG Meijiao1  GONG Jian1  GONG Liqing2  ZHANG Yibao1  WU Hao1
Affiliation:1. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China 2. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Nutrition, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
Abstract:Purpose This work aims to carry out a Monte Carlo based investigation on the precision of dose estimation for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans based on anisotropic analytical algorithm, focusing on preoperative rectum tumor. Methods 20 VMAT plans of preoperative rectum tumor have been optimized using AAA and RapidPlan model. The precision of RapidPlan estimated dose estimations are evaluated via comparison with independent calculation of dose distribution based on Monte Carlo simulations. The comparison is carried out using several key parameters: mean DVH, Homogeneity Index (HI), Conformity Index (CI), 3D Gamma pass rate. Results 3D Gamma pass rate under two different criteria are 97.58±0.47%、92.46±1.76% for max dose and local dose, respectively,where the difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05) for parameters that do not conform with normal distribution (except for CI of PGTV and Dmin of PTV, where non-parametric test has shown statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) other parameters tested with pair sample t-test all reveal statistical significant difference (P < 0.05).Conclusion The RapidPlan estimation mainly differs in low dose region with MC simulation, which is related to the anisotropic analytical algorithm precision. Mean values of CI and HI in MC simulation are higher than those in RapidPlan estimation. In the meantime, RapidPlan model underestimates Dmean and D50% of femoral head and bladder
Keywords:Monte Carlo simulation RapidPlan model Gamma 3D analysis volumetric modulated arc therapy anisotropic analytical algorithm
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国医学物理学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学物理学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号