Adherence to Initial PDE5 Inhibitor Treatment: Randomized OpenLabel Study Comparing Tadalafil Once a Day,Tadalafil on Demand,and Sildenafil on Demand in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction |
| |
Authors: | Jacques Buvat Hartwig Büttner Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis Pedro A.S. Vendeira Ignacio Moncada Michael Boehmer Carsten Henneges Frank G. Boess |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre d''Etude et de Traitement de la Pathologie de l''Appareil Reproducteur et de la Psychosomatique (Centre ETPARP), Lille, France;2. Medical Department, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany;3. 2nd Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece;4. Saúde Atlântica, Clínica do Dragão, Porto, Portugal;5. Department of Urology, Hospital La Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain;6. Diabetological Practice, Warburg, Germany;7. Global Statistical Sciences, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | IntroductionPhosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently discontinued; adherence may vary depending on the initial regimen.AimTo evaluate the effects of initiating treatment with tadalafil once a day (OaD), tadalafil on demand (pro re nata [PRN]), or sildenafil PRN on treatment adherence.MethodsIn this multicenter, openlabel study, men (≥18 years) with ED, naïve to PDE5 inhibitors, were randomized (1:1:1) to tadalafil 5 mg OaD, tadalafil 10 mg PRN, or sildenafil 50 mg PRN. An 8week randomized treatment (RT) period (dose adjustment possible) was succeeded by 16 weeks of pragmatic treatment (switches between PDE5 inhibitors allowed).Main Outcome MeasuresTreatment adherence was measured as time to discontinuation of RT (any cause), estimated by Kaplan–Meier productlimit method. Treatmentgroup differences were estimated as hazard ratio (HR; Cox proportional hazards).ResultsSeven hundred seventy patients (mean age 53 years) were randomized to tadalafil OaD (N = 257), tadalafil PRN (N = 252), and sildenafil PRN (N = 261). Kaplan–Meier estimates for patients discontinuing RT were 52.2, 42.0, and 66.7%, respectively. Median time to discontinuation of RT was significantly longer for tadalafil OaD and PRN (130 and >168 days) compared with sildenafil (67 days) (HR [97.5% confidence interval]: 0.66 [0.51, 0.85] and 0.49 [0.37, 0.65]; P < 0.001). Reasons for discontinuation with significant differences between groups (P < 0.05) included “lack of efficacy (duration of erection)” (sildenafil 9.2% vs. tadalafil OaD 4.3%, PRN 2.8%), “time constraints due to short window of action” (sildenafil 4.2% vs. tadalafil OaD 0%, PRN 0.4%), and “feel medication controls my sexual life” (sildenafil 2.7% vs. tadalafil OaD 0%). No betweengroup differences were found in International Index of Erectile FunctionErectile Function domain change from baseline to end of RT (least squares mean: 9.4–10.0, P = 0.359) or discontinuations due to adverse events (1.2–1.6%). The most common adverse event (≥4%) was headache.ConclusionsED patients assigned to tadalafil OaD or PRN adhered significantly longer to initial treatment than patients assigned to sildenafil PRN. Improvement of erectile function and safety profiles were similar in all three treatment groups. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|