Programmed stimulation in the evaluation of life-threatening or potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

Conclusion In conclusion, programmed stimulation is an excellent and appropriate method to guide thrapy for life-threatening and potentially life-threatening arrhythmias that occur infrequently and with unpredictable timing.The sensitivity and specificity of programmed stimulation is excellent in patients whose clinical presentation is by sustained uniform ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest. In contrast, such parameters are substantially less in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and in those who present wit syncope. The predictive accuracy of therapy guided by programmed electrical stimulation in cohorts with cardiac artest and sustained uniform ventricular tachycardia cohorts is reasonably well established and appears to be very good. Although no large randomized controlled comparative study of noninvasive versus PES-guided therapy has yet been completed, preliminary evidence suggests that there is a decreased incidence of arrhythmia recurrence and sudden cardiac death when therapy is guided by PES. In the minority of patients with syncope in whom sustained uniform ventricular tachycardia is induced during PES, therapy may be effectively guided by this modality. PES appears to be of benefit in managing patients with coronary artery disease who present with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and depressed ejection fraction thereby defining a high risk subset for a subsequent arrhythmic event. However, we have not found electrophysiologic testing postmyocardial infarction to be prognostically useful.Dr. Josephson is the Robinette Foundation Professor of Medicine (Cardiovascular Diseases)Supported in part by grants from the American Heart Association, Southeastern Pennsylvania Chapter, Philadelphia, PA; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (HL28093, HL07346, HL24278).