首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

低分子肝素与普通肝素治疗不稳定型心绞痛的对比分析
引用本文:付红莉.低分子肝素与普通肝素治疗不稳定型心绞痛的对比分析[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006,4(9):764-765.
作者姓名:付红莉
作者单位:山西省太原市人民医院,030001
摘    要:目的 比较低分子肝素(LMWH)与普通肝素(UFH)治疗不稳定型心绞痛(UA)的有效性及安全性:方法 65例UA病人,随机分为LMWH组(33例)和UFH组(32例),对比观察风组病人心绞痛改善程度、心电图变化情况及不良反应:结果 LMWH组和UFH组心绞痛改善程度比较,两组总有效率比较有统计学意义(93.9%和75.0%,P〈0.05),心电图变化情况总有效率比较无统计学意义(66.7%和62.5%,P〉0.05),不良反应发生率比较有统计学意义(9.1%和15.6%,P〈0、05)。结论 LMWH治疗UA较UFH治疗可显著减少心绞痛的发作,且不良反应少。

关 键 词:低分子肝素  普通肝素  不稳定型心绞痛
文章编号:1672-1349(2006)09-0764-02
修稿时间:2006年6月21日

Comparison Between Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin in The Treatment of Unstable Angina
Fu Hongli.Comparison Between Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin in The Treatment of Unstable Angina[J].Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-/Cerebrovascular Disease,2006,4(9):764-765.
Authors:Fu Hongli
Institution:Taiyuan 030001
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect and safety between low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of unstable angina (UA).Methods Sixty-five cases with UA were divided into group LMWH (33 cases) and group UFH (32 cases randomly).The melioration of angina,electrocardiogram change and side effects were Compared.Results There was significant difference of the melioration of angina onset (93.9% vs 75.0%,P<0.05) and side effects (9.1% vs 15.6%,P<0.05),but no difference of electrocardiogram change (66.7% vs 62.5%,P>0.05) between the two groups.Conclusion For the treatment of UA,LMWH reduce the angina onset and where was a few side effect.
Keywords:low molecular weight heparin  unfractionated heparin  unstable angina
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号