首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Clinical consequences of primary CMV infection after renal transplantation: a case–control study
Authors:Ramandeep Singh  Hessel Peters-Sengers  Ester BM Remmerswaal  Unsal Yapici  Karlijn A M I van der Pant  Neelke C van der Weerd  Joris J T H Roelofs  René A W van Lier  Fréderike J Bemelman  Sandrine Florquin  Ineke J M ten Berge
Institution:1. Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;4. Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;5. Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract:The impact of primary cytomegalovirus infection (pCMV) on renal allograft function and histology is controversial. We evaluated the influence on incidence of acute rejection, allograft loss, allograft function and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). Retrospective case–control study, recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2014. Risk of acute rejection and allograft loss for those who experienced pCMV infection compared with those who did not, within an exposure period of two months after transplantation. Besides, its influence on allograft function and histology at one to three years after transplantation. Of 113 recipients experienced pCMV infection, 306 remained CMV seronegative. pCMV infection in the exposure period could not be proven as increasing the risk for acute rejection HR = 2.18 (95% CI 0.80–5.97) P = 0.13] or allograft loss HR = 1.11 (95%CI 0.33–3.72) P = 0.87]. Combination of pCMV infection and acute rejection posed higher hazard for allograft loss than acute rejection alone HR = 3.69 (95% CI 1.21–11.29) P = 0.02]. eGFR(MDRD) values did not significantly differ at years one 46 vs. 50], two 46 vs. 51] and three 46 vs. 52]. No association between pCMV infection and IF/TA could be demonstrated OR = 2.15 (95%CI 0.73–6.29) P = 0.16]. pCMV infection was not proven to increase the risk for acute rejection or allograft loss. However, it increased the risk for rejection-associated allograft loss. In remaining functioning allografts, it was not significantly associated with decline in function nor with presence of IF/TA.
Keywords:primary CMV infection  renal transplantation  renal allograft outcome
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号