2种湿性敷料在Ⅱ级以上外周静脉炎中应用的效果评价

目的 探讨2种湿性敷料用于Ⅱ级以上外周静脉炎的处理效果.方法 将64例2级或以上外周静脉炎患者随机分成观察组(36例)和对照组(28例).分别使用舒康博G水凝胶敷料和舒康博H水胶体敷料,在使用后4,24,48,72 h观察2组静脉炎分级、疼痛评分、红肿及条索样的变化.结果 2组处理前后自身对照,静脉炎分级、疼痛评分、红肿及条索样变化均有显著差异;组间比较静脉炎分级改变差异显著,红肿及条索样变化在48,72 h 2个时间点上差异显著,疼痛评分变化没有显著差异.结论 舒康博G水凝胶敷料和舒康博H水胶体敷料对静脉炎处理均有良好的效果;舒康博G水凝胶敷料在静脉炎程度改善方面优于舒康博H水胶体敷料;在静脉炎红肿范围的缩小及条索样消散方面,随着时间的推移,效果同样优于舒康博H水胶体敷料;但两者在缓解疼痛方面效果近似.

Abstract：

Objective To observe the effects of Suprasorb G and Suprasorb H on peripheral phlebitis above stage Ⅱ. Methods 64 patients with peripheral phlebitis above Stage Ⅱ were randomly divided into the observation group (36 patients) and the control group (28 patients). The observation group used Suprasorb G, and the control group used Suprasorb H. All cases were tested with the change of stage of peripheral phlebitis, the pain score, the red swelling of the skin and the palpable vascular cord. Results After treatment with Suprasorb H or Suprasorb G, there were significant differences in the change of stage of peripheral phlebitis, red swelling of the skin, pain score and the change of palpable vascular cord by self-contrast before and after treatment. Significant differences existed in change of stage of peripheral phlebitis, and red swelling of the skin and the change of palpable vascular cord at 48 and 72 hours, but no change was seen in pain score between 2 groups. Conclusions Suprasorb G and Suprasorb H beth show good effect in treatment of peripheral phlebitis, but Suprasorb G is better than Suprasorb H in improving the stage of peripheral phlebitis, also in reducing the area of red swelling of the skin and the palpable vascular cord with passage of time. But there is no difference in releasing of pain caused by peripheral phlebitis between them.