What the Patient Wants: An Analysis of Radiology-Related Inquiries From a Web-Based Patient Portal |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;2. Division of Abdominal Imaging, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan;3. Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan;4. Michigan Radiology Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan;1. Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina;2. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio;1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California;2. Division of Medical Education, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;3. Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Stanford University, Stanford, California;1. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas;2. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;1. Department of Radiology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;3. Department of Physician Assistant Studies, Elon University, Elon, North Carolina;4. Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;5. Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;1. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas;2. Arkansas Children’s Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas;3. Department of Pediatric Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas;4. Department of Pediatric Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas;5. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas |
| |
| Abstract: | PurposeWith the development of patient portals, the opportunity exists to identify gaps in practice by analyzing priorities patients place on the receipt and comprehension of radiology reports. Our purpose was to describe the nature of radiology-specific patient information requests by analysis of patient-initiated messages submitted through a web-based electronic patient portal.MethodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective cross-sectional study. All patient-initiated messages submitted to the web-based patient portal at a large academic medical center between October 1, 2014 and December 11, 2014 were analyzed. Messages containing radiology-specific key terms including “x-ray,” “xray,” “xr,” “ct,” “cat,” “mri,” “scan,” “ultrasound,” “image,” and “radiology” were identified and messages categorized by content. The demographics of message writers were also analyzed. Diagnostic imaging studies performed during this period were tabulated by modality. Proportions were compared with χ2 tests.ResultsDuring the time period studied, there were 1,597 messages from 1,489 patients inquiring about 1,609 examinations. Messages containing ≥1 radiology-specific keyword were significantly more likely to originate from women than from men (64% 946/1,489] versus 36% 543/1,489], P < .0001), with 53% of studies (52,322/98,897) performed on female patients and 47% (46,575/98,897) on male patients. The relative percentages of modality-specific patient inquiries were significantly discrepant (P < .001) from actual scan volume for some modalities (MRI: 38% 607/1,609] versus 11% 11,152/98,897], CT: 25% 400/1,609] versus 19% 19,032/98,897], plain radiography: 23% 368/1,609] versus 55% 54,497/98,897]). The most common inquiry was for imaging results (33% 521/1,597], P < .001); these were submitted a median of 5 days (range: 0-368 days) after imaging. The radiology turnaround time (between exam completion in the Radiology Information System and signoff on report) was 5 hours, versus 70 hours for referring provider review. Inquiries about radiation dose or radiation risk represented 0.1% (2/1,597) of all inquiries.ConclusionPatients submitting radiology-specific messages through an electronic patient portal are most concerned about imaging results, particularly those pertaining to advanced (CT and MRI) imaging studies. |
| |
| Keywords: | Patient portal electronic medical record patient preferences informatics CT MRI ultrasound radiography |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
