首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

2004-2017年云桂甲乙类传染病领域计划与评价机制可落实程度分析
引用本文:刘娅莉,陈菲,徐凌忠,李力,陈任,李伯阳,冯占春,胡志,沈群红,林振平,于芳,田壮,马东平,陈政,钱东福,李程跃,郝模,蒲川,蒋祎.2004-2017年云桂甲乙类传染病领域计划与评价机制可落实程度分析[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2020(3):209-214.
作者姓名:刘娅莉  陈菲  徐凌忠  李力  陈任  李伯阳  冯占春  胡志  沈群红  林振平  于芳  田壮  马东平  陈政  钱东福  李程跃  郝模  蒲川  蒋祎
作者单位:重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院;复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心;山东大学公共卫生学院;安徽医科大学;华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院;清华大学公共管理学院;南京医科大学医政学院;潍坊医学院公共卫生与管理学院;济宁医学院公共卫生学院;中华预防医学会公共卫生管理分会基层公共卫生管理学组;健康相关重大社会风险预警协同创新中心;健康相关重大社会风险预警协同创新中心重医分中心
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(18XGJ016);上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2015年-2017年)项目(GWIV-32);健康相关重大社会风险预警协同创新中心科研基金。
摘    要:目的分析云南、广西两地主要部门(机构)甲乙类传染病计划与评价机制可落实情况及其差异的可信度,检验基于文献研究视角评价工作落实情况的可行性。方法收集1987-2017年所有涉及云南、广西两地主要部门(机构)对甲乙类传染病领域工作落实程度评价的政策文件,采用文献计量分析方法,从政策文件中分析主要部门对甲乙类传染病防控任务的关注度,以此对工作落实程度进行评价(0分表示文件集中没有相应指标,1分表示文件集中提到该指标)。运用Spearman相关性分析工作任务可落实程度与甲乙类传染病发病率间的关系。结果云南的甲乙类传染病发病率2004-2011年呈先上升后下降的趋势,2011年后基本呈缓慢上升趋势。云南省中长期目标及评价体系的可落实程度总体呈上升趋势;广西的甲乙类传染病发病率2004-2011年呈缓慢上升趋势,在2011年达到了发病率的最高值356.13/10万,2011年后总体呈下降趋势。其中长期目标及其评价体系的可落实程度总体呈上升趋势,2004-2011年上升幅度较为缓慢,2014年后大幅度上升。两地甲乙类传染病发病率与工作任务可落实程度之间呈现负相关(相关系数均大于0.5)。结论云桂两地支撑部门在传染病领域的职责明确程度有待加强;云南省在传染病领域评价指标对主要部门的覆盖程度低于广西,且云南省计划与评价机制可落实程度对健康结果的促进作用较广西地区更为明显;基于政策文件分析视角对传染病计划与评价机制可落实程度的量化是可行的。

关 键 词:主要部门(机构)  传染病任务  可落实程度  可行性

Implementation of planning and evaluation mechanisms in the field of infectious diseases in Yunnan and Guangxi during 2004-2017
LIU Yali,CHEN Fei,XU Lingzhong,LI Li,CHEN Ren,LI Boyang,FENG Zhanchun,HU Zhi,SHEN Qunhong,LIN Zhenping,YU Fang,TIAN Zhuang,MA Dongping,CHEN Zheng,QIAN Dongfu,LI Chengyue,HAO Mo,PU Chuan,JIANG Yi.Implementation of planning and evaluation mechanisms in the field of infectious diseases in Yunnan and Guangxi during 2004-2017[J].Chinese Rural Health Service Administration,2020(3):209-214.
Authors:LIU Yali  CHEN Fei  XU Lingzhong  LI Li  CHEN Ren  LI Boyang  FENG Zhanchun  HU Zhi  SHEN Qunhong  LIN Zhenping  YU Fang  TIAN Zhuang  MA Dongping  CHEN Zheng  QIAN Dongfu  LI Chengyue  HAO Mo  PU Chuan  JIANG Yi
Institution:(School of Public Health and Management,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China;Research Institute of Health Development Strategies,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;School of Public Health,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong 250012,China;Anhui Medical University,Hefei,Anhui 230032,China;School of Medicine and Health Management of Tongji Medical College,HUST,Wuhan,Hubei 430030,China;School of Public Policy and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Health Policy and Management,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211166,China;School of Public Health and Management,Weifang Medical University,Weifang,Shandong 261053,China;School of Public Health,Jining Medical University,Jining,Shandong 272067,China;Department of Grassroots Public Health Management Group,Public Health Management Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association,Shanghai 201800,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China)
Abstract:Objective To analyze the implementation of planning and evaluation mechanism for Class A and B infectious diseases in major departments(institutions) of Yunnan Province and Guangxi Province, and the reliability of differences between Yunnan and Guangxi, and to test the feasibility of evaluating the implementation of work from the perspective of literature review. Methods The policy documents on the evaluation of Class A and B infectious diseases control work in major departments(institutions) of Yunnan and Guangxi from 1987 to 2017 were collected. The focus of major departments(institutions) of Yunnan and Guangxi on the prevention and control of Class A and B infectious diseases was analyzed using bibliometric method and evaluation was conducted of the implementation degree of work(0 point means there is no corresponding indicator in the file set, 1 point means that the indicator is mentioned in the file set). Spearman correlation was used to analyze the relationship between the implementation of the work and morbidity. Results The incidence of Class A and B infectious diseases in Yunnan showed a trend of first rising and then falling from 2004 to 2011, and basically showed a slow rising trend after 2011. The degree of implementation of middle-and long-term goals and evaluation system was generally on the rise. The incidence of Class A and B infectious diseases in Guangxi increased slowly from 2004 to 2011, reaching a peak of 356.13/100,000 in 2011, and declined generally after 2011. The degree of implementation of the medium-and long-term goals and their evaluation system was generally on the rise, with a relatively slow increase during 2004-2011 and a substantial increase after 2014. There was a negative correlation between the incidence of Class A and B infectious diseases and the degree of implementation of work tasks(P>0.05). Conclusions The responsibilities of supporting departments in Yunnan and Guangxi in the field of infectious diseases need to be strengthened. The evaluation indexes of infectious diseases in Yunnan cover less major sectors than those in Guangxi, and the degree of implementation of planning and evaluation mechanism in Yunnan plays a more significant role in promoting health outcomes than that in Guangxi. It is feasible to quantify the degree of implementation of infectious disease planning and evaluation mechanism from the perspective of policy document analysis.
Keywords:Major departments(institutions)  Infectious disease task  Degree of implementation  Feasibility
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号