首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

盐酸环喷托酯、复方托吡卡胺与阿托品对儿童睫状肌麻痹效果的比较
引用本文:孟艳芳,周炼红,熊雪薇,胡学敏,赵文燕,叶美红,易贝茜.盐酸环喷托酯、复方托吡卡胺与阿托品对儿童睫状肌麻痹效果的比较[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2020,22(12):889-894.
作者姓名:孟艳芳  周炼红  熊雪薇  胡学敏  赵文燕  叶美红  易贝茜
作者单位:Yanfang Meng1 , Lianhong Zhou1 , Xuewei Xiong1 , Xuemin Hu1 , Wenyan Zhao2 , Meihong Ye1 , Beixi Yi1
基金项目:湖北省中央引导地方科技发展专项(2019ZYYD058)
摘    要:目的:探讨盐酸环喷托酯、复方托吡卡胺与阿托品对不同年龄、屈光状态及调节性内斜视儿童的睫 状肌麻痹效果。方法:前瞻性临床研究。对2018年9月至2019年9月在武汉大学人民医院眼科就诊 的3~12岁屈光不正儿童283例(566眼)行睫状肌麻痹验光。所有患儿均先使用1%阿托品眼用凝胶 点眼后电脑验光,并随机分为A组和B组。2组均按年龄分为3~<6岁组和6~<12岁组,3~<6岁组 和6~<12岁组再分为无内斜近视组、无内斜远视组和伴内斜视组3个亚组。5周后,瞳孔大小及对光 反射恢复正常,A组使用1%盐酸环喷托酯滴眼液点眼后电脑验光,B组使用0.5%复方托吡卡胺滴眼 液点眼后电脑验光。采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验对1%阿托品睫状肌麻痹前后电脑验光等效球镜度 (SE)差值、不同药物睫状肌麻痹后电脑验光差值进行统计分析。结果:1%阿托品散瞳后SE较散瞳 前偏正,SE差值为1.75(1.00~2.75)D,差异有统计学意义(Z=-20.62,P<0.001)。差异在3~<6岁 儿童、无内斜远视儿童及伴内斜视儿童中更明显(P<0.001)。A组使用1%阿托品散瞳后SE较使用 1%盐酸环喷托酯后偏正,SE差值为0.25(0.13~0.50)D(Z=-11.49,P<0.001)。3~<6岁组使用1% 阿托品后和使用1%盐酸环喷托酯后的SE差值在无内斜近视组、无内斜远视组和伴内斜视组分别为 0.25(0.25~0.25)D、0.38(0.25~0.50)D、0.50(0.38~0.75)D(Z=-3.34、-7.36、-4.95,均 P<0.001)。6~<12岁组的SE差值在3组为0(0~0.12)D、0.25(0.12~0.25)D、0.44(0.28~0.69)D (Z=-0.83,P=0.405;Z=-5.30,P<0.001;Z=-3.53,P<0.001)。B组使用1%阿托品散瞳后SE较使用0.5% 复方托吡卡胺后偏正,SE差值为0.25(0.13~0.50)D(Z=-15.46,P<0.001)。3~<6岁组使用1%阿 托品后和使用0.5%复方托吡卡胺后的SE差值在无内斜近视组、无内斜远视组和伴内斜视组分别为 0.25(0.19~0.25)D、0.38(0.25~0.75)D、0.69(0.30~1.03)D(Z=-3.15,P=0.002,Z=-9.89, P<0.001,Z=-4.79,P<0.001)。6~<12岁组的SE差值在3组分别为0(0~0.12)D、0.32(0.13~0.38)D、 0.50(0.41~0.50)D(Z=-1.37,P=0.171;Z=-7.15,P<0.001;Z=-4.37,P<0.001)。结论:1%盐酸环 喷托酯滴眼液或0.5%复方托吡卡胺滴眼液点眼后散瞳验光SE与1%阿托品眼用凝胶点眼后散瞳验光 的SE在6~<12岁无内斜视的近视儿童中相近,在3~<6岁和6~<12岁远视及伴内斜视儿童中存在 差异。

关 键 词:   盐酸环喷托酯  复方托吡卡胺  阿托品  睫状肌麻痹剂  
收稿时间:2020-05-12

Comparison of Cyclopentolate,Compound Tropicamide and Atropine on Cycloplegiain Children
Yanfang Meng,Lianhong Zhou,Xuewei Xiong,Xuemin Hu,Wenyan Zhao,Meihong Ye,Beixi Yi.Comparison of Cyclopentolate,Compound Tropicamide and Atropine on Cycloplegiain Children[J].Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science,2020,22(12):889-894.
Authors:Yanfang Meng  Lianhong Zhou  Xuewei Xiong  Xuemin Hu  Wenyan Zhao  Meihong Ye  Beixi Yi
Institution: 1.Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Huangshi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Huangshi 435003, China
Abstract:Objective: To investigate and compare the cycloplegic effect of cyclopentolate, compound topicamide and atropine in children with different ages, refractive status and accommodative esotropia. Methods: This prospective clinical study had been conducted at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between September 2018 and September 2019 in 283 children (566 eyes) of 3-12 years old with refractive error. All the children were given 1% atropine to obtain the refractive diopter, and they were randomly divided into group A and group B. The two group are divided into 3-<6 years old group and 6-<12 years old group according to age. The 3-<6 years old group and the 6-<12 years old group are divided into three subgroups: The myopia group without esotropia, the hyperopia group without esotropia and the esotropia group. After 5 weeks, pupil size and light reflex back to normal. Group A received 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride eye drops for computer optometry, and group B received 0.5% compound tropicamide eye drops for computer optometry. The Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to statistically analyze the difference of spherical equivalent of computer optometry before and after 1% atropine, and the difference of computer optometry after different cycloplegia. Results: The SE after 1% atropine was greater than before 1% atropine, the difference of SE was 1.75(1.00-2.75)D, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-20.62, P<0.001). The difference was more obvious children with aged 3 to 6, children with hyperopia and children with esotropia (P<0.001). In group A, the SE after using 1% atropine was greater than that after using 1% cyclopentolate, and the difference of SE was 0.25(0.13-0.50)D (Z=-11.49, P<0.001). The difference of SE in 3-<6 years old group after using 1% atropine and 1% cyclopentolate in the myopia group without esotropia, hyperopia group without esotropia and esotropia group were 0.25(0.25-0.25)D, 0.38(0.25-0.50)D, 0.50(0.38-0.75)D (Z=-3.34, -7.36, -4.95, all P<0.001). The difference of SE of that 3 subgroups in the 6-<12 years group were 0(0-0.12)D, 0.25(0.12-0.25)D, 0.44(0.28-0.69)D (Z=-0.83, P=0.405; Z=-5.30, P<0.001; Z=-3.53, P<0.001). In group B, the SE after using 1% atropine was greater than that after using 0.5% compound tropicamide, and the difference of SE was 0.25(0.13-0.50)D (Z=-15.46, P<0.001). The difference of SE in 3-<6 years old group after using 1% atropine and 0.5% compound tropicamide in the myopia group without esotropia, hyperopia group without esotropia and esotropia group were 0.25(0.19- 0.25)D, 0.38(0.25-0.75)D, 0.69(0.30-1.03)D (Z=-3.15, P=0.002; Z=-9.89, P<0.001; Z=-4.79, P<0.001). The difference of SE of that 3 subgroups in the 6-<12 years group were 0(0-0.12)D, 0.32(0.13-0.38)D, 0.50(0.41-0.50)D (Z=-1.37, P=0.171; Z=-7.15, P<0.001; Z=-4.37, P<0.001). Conclusions: The spherical equivalent of mydriasis refraction with 1% cyclopentolate eye drops or 0.5% compound tropicamide eye drops is similar to that with 1% atropine in myopic children aged 6 to 12 years without esotropia, and it is different from that with 1% atropine in 3-<6 years old children and children with hyperopia and esotropia at 6-<12 years old.
Keywords:cyclopentolate  compound topicamide  atropine  cycloplegia  
点击此处可从《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号