首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with tanespimycin in advanced epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma
Authors:Hendrickson Andrea E Wahner  Oberg Ann L  Glaser Gretchen  Camoriano John K  Peethambaram Prema P  Colon-Otero Gerardo  Erlichman Charles  Ivy S Percy  Kaufmann Scott H  Karnitz Larry M  Haluska Paul
Affiliation:
  • a Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • b Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics within the Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • c Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • d Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
  • e Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85054, USA
  • f National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD 20852, USA
  • g Division of Oncology Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • h Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • Abstract:

    Objective

    To evaluate the efficacy and biological effects of the gemcitabine/tanespimycin combination in patients with advanced ovarian and peritoneal cancer. To assess the effect of tanespimycin on tumor cells, levels of the chaperone proteins HSP90 and HSP70 were examined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and paired tumor biopsy lysates.

    Methods

    Two-cohort phase II clinical trial. Patients were grouped according to prior gemcitabine therapy. All participants received tanespimycin 154 mg/m2 on days 1 and 9 of cycle 1 and days 2 and 9 of subsequent cycles. Patients also received gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 on day 8 of the first treatment cycle and days 1 and 8 of subsequent cycles.

    Results

    The tanespimycin/gemcitabine combination induced a partial response in 1 gemcitabine naïve patient and no partial responses in gemcitabine resistant patients. Stable disease was seen in 6 patients (2 gemcitabine naïve and 4 gemcitabine resistant). The most common toxicities were hematologic (anemia and neutropenia) as well as nausea and vomiting. Immunoblotting demonstrated limited upregulation of HSP70 but little or no change in levels of most client proteins in PBMC and paired tumor samples.

    Conclusions

    Although well tolerated, the tanespimycin/gemcitabine combination exhibited limited anticancer activity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma, perhaps because of failure to significantly downregulate the client proteins at clinically achievable exposures.
    Keywords:Phase I/II trials   Tanespimycin   Gemcitabine   Ovarian cancer   Peritoneal cancer   Heat shock protein 90
    本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
    设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

    Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号