首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

CS方案和SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察
引用本文:宋红蕾,毕延智,陈慧暖,徐珍,董益忠,盛桂凤,张亚平,胡岳棣. CS方案和SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察[J]. 癌症进展, 2012, 10(5): 514-518
作者姓名:宋红蕾  毕延智  陈慧暖  徐珍  董益忠  盛桂凤  张亚平  胡岳棣
作者单位:苏州大学附属常州肿瘤医院,常州,213001;福建省中医药大学附属漳州市中医院,漳州,363000
摘    要:目的比较替吉奥联合顺铂的CS方案与替吉奥联合奥沙利铂的SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法经病理学诊断为晚期胃癌患者45例,随机分为CS组和SOX组。CS组:替吉奥胶囊(用量依体表面积而定:体表面积1.25 m~2的患者,每次40 mg;体表面积≥1.25 m~2但1.50 m~2者,每次50 mg;体表面积≥1.5 m~2者,每次60 mg)一天2次,第1~14天早、晚饭后分别口服;顺铂注射液75mg/m~2分三天(第1~3天)静脉滴注。每21天重复1次,至少治疗2个周期。SOX组:替吉奥胶囊(用量依体表面积而定:体表面积1.25 m~2的患者,每次40 mg;体表面积≥1.25 m~2但1.50 m~2者,每次50 mg;体表面积≥1.5 m~2者,每次60 mg)一天2次,第1~14天早、晚饭后分别口服;奥沙利铂注射液130 mg/m~2加入5%葡萄糖注射液250 ml避光缓慢静脉滴注2 h,第1天,每21天重复1次,至少治疗2个周期。全部病例均有可测量病灶进行客观疗效评价。结果 CS组:完全缓解(CR)0例,部分缓解(PR)4例,稳定(SD)11例,进展(PD)5例,有效率(RR)为20%,疾病控制率(DCR)为75%。SOX组:CR 0例,PR 9例,SD 13例,PD 3例,RR为36%,DCR为88%。两组RR和DCR差异无统计学意义。两组主要毒副反应为胃肠道反应、外周神经毒性、血液毒性和色素沉着,SOX组患者周围神经炎发生率明显高于CS组,χ~2=8.82,P=0.003,差异具有统计学意义。结论 CS方案和SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌近期疗效接近,SOX方案组周围神经炎发生率高但患者可以耐受,值得临床进一步研究应用。

关 键 词:晚期胃癌  替吉奥  奥沙利铂  顺铂

The clinical research of CS regimen and SOX regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
SONG Hong-lei , BI Yan-zhi , CHEN Hui-nuan , XU Zhen , DONG Yi-zhong , SHENG Gui-feng , ZHANG Ya-ping , HU Yue-di. The clinical research of CS regimen and SOX regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma[J]. Oncology Progress, 2012, 10(5): 514-518
Authors:SONG Hong-lei    BI Yan-zhi    CHEN Hui-nuan    XU Zhen    DONG Yi-zhong    SHENG Gui-feng    ZHANG Ya-ping    HU Yue-di
Affiliation:1 Department of Oncology,Affiliated Changzhou Tumor Hospital,Soochow University,Changzhou 213001,China 2 Zhangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhangzhou 363000,China
Abstract:Objective To observe the effects and adverse reactions of S-1/cisplatin regimen (CS) and S-1/Oxalipla- tin regimen (SOX) in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods 45 patients were randomized into CS group (20 patients received S-1 and cisplatin) and SOX group (25 patients received S-1 and oxaliplatin). The clinical effects and adverse reactions were evaluated after two treatment cycles. Results The response rates were 20% (CR 0 cases, PR 4 cases) vs 36% ( CR 0 cases, PR 9 cases) (P 〉 0. 05 ) , and the disease control rates (DCR) were 75% vs 88% in CS group and SOX group, respectively ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The main adverse reactions were gastrointestinal tract reaction, peripher- al sensory neuropathy, myelosuppression, and pigmentation. served in SOX group compared with CS group (P =0. 003). A higher incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy was ob- Conclusion Patients with advanced gastric carcinoma have a similar response rate (RR) to both CS regimen and SOX regimen, and the latter is of a higher incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy which is tolerable and worth further investigation.
Keywords:advanced gastric carcinoma  S-1  oxaliplatin  cisplatin
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号