首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Cisplatin alone or combined with gemcitabine in carcinomas of unknown primary: results of the randomised GEFCAPI 02 trial
Authors:Gross-Goupil M  Fourcade A  Blot E  Penel N  Négrier S  Culine S  Chaigneau L  Lesimple T  Priou F  Lortholary A  Kaminsky M C  Provencal J  Voog E  Bouzy J  Laplanche A  Fizazi K
Institution:Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France. marine.gross-goupil@chu-bordeaux.fr
Abstract:PurposeTo compare the overall survival rates of good-prognosis carcinomas of an unknown primary site (CUPS) patients treated with cisplatin alone (C) or in combination with gemcitabine (CG).Patients and methodsGood prognosis was defined according to the GEFCAPI (Groupe d’Etude Français des Carcinomes de site Primitif Inconnu) classification by PS (Performance Status) ?1 and LDH (Lactate Deshydrogenase) within the normal range. Patients were randomly assigned to receive C or CG. Patients in the C arm received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. In the CG arm, chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. The original plan was to accrue 192 patients in order to detect a 20% difference in overall survival.ResultsFifty-two patients were enrolled (arm A: 25; arm B: 27). The trial was stopped early due to insufficient accrual. The median overall survival (OS) rate was 11 months 95% confidence interval: 9–20] and 8 months 95% CI: 6–12], in the CG arm and in the C arm, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 46% 95% CI: 28–64] in the combination arm and 35% 95% CI: 19–56] in the C arm (log rank test: p = 0.73). The median progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 5 95% CI: 3–11] and 3 95% CI: 1–8] months in the CG and in the C arm, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate was 29% 95% CI: 15–48] in the combination arm and 15% 95% CI: 5–35] in the C arm (log rank test: p = 0.27). No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3–4 neutropenia (63% versus 12%) and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (37% versus 4%) were more frequent in the CG arm than in the C arm.ConclusionA non-significantly better outcome was observed with CG as compared to C in patients with CUP and a non-unfavourable prognosis. The toxicity profile of the combined arm was represented by haematologic toxicity with thrombocytopenia and leuconeutropenia. International collaboration is required to conduct phase III trials in patients with CUP.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号