首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Divergent estimates of HIV incidence among people who inject drugs in Ukraine
Affiliation:1. Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive W., Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada;2. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul''s Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada;3. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 5804 Fairview Avenue, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada;4. Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul''s Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
Abstract:BackgroundDivergent estimates of HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine have been reported in modeling studies, longitudinal cohort studies, and recent infection assays used in cross-sectional surveys. Estimates range from 0.65 to 24.8 infections per 100 person-years with substantial regional variation. In this paper, we study the sources of this discrepancy.MethodsWe compared baseline characteristics of study subjects recruited in the cross-sectional integrated bio-behavioral surveillance surveys (IBBS) in 2011 and 2013, with those from the longitudinal network intervention trial (network RCT) conducted between 2010 – 2013, the study that found a remarkably high incidence of HIV among PWID in Ukraine. The analysis was conducted for two cities: Mykolaiv and Odesa.ResultsSignificant differences were found in the characteristics of study subjects recruited in the IBBS surveys and the network RCT, in particular in Odesa, where the mismatch in the estimates of HIV incidence is greatest. In Odesa, recent syringe sharing was about three times as prevalent in the network RCT as in the IBBS; 39% of the network RCT and 16–18% of the IBBS participants indicated stimulants rather than opiates as their drug of choice; 97% of respondents in the network RCT and 45% in the IBBS-2013 reported injecting in a group over half of the time; and the average monthly number of injections in the network RCT was about twice that in the IBBS studies.ConclusionsDifferences in study designs and sampling methodologies may be responsible for the substantial differences in HIV incidence estimates among PWID in Ukraine. The potential sources of selection bias differed between the studies and likely resulted in the recruitment of lower risk individuals into the IBBS studies compared to the network RCT. Risk stratification in the population of PWID may have implications for future surveillance and intervention efforts.
Keywords:HIV incidence  HIV surveillance  Sampling methods in hidden populations  Respondent-driven sampling (RDS)  People who inject drugs (PWID)  Ukraine
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号