起搏器心室自身优先功能对累计心室起搏比例及心功能的影响 |
| |
引用本文: | 蔡振荣,陆铭,王志华,庄晓华,凌佳,阚丽虹,罗心平,王静恩. 起搏器心室自身优先功能对累计心室起搏比例及心功能的影响[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2013, 0(12): 905-907 |
| |
作者姓名: | 蔡振荣 陆铭 王志华 庄晓华 凌佳 阚丽虹 罗心平 王静恩 |
| |
作者单位: | 上海市浦东医院/复旦大学附属浦东医院心血管内科,201399 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的观察具有心室自身优先(VIP)功能的起搏器对累计心室起搏比例及心脏功能的影响。方法选择因缓慢性心律失常安装心脏起搏器的患者62例。所有患者均为心房电极位于右心耳,心室电极位于右室心尖部;根据植入后是否开启心室自身优先功能分为观察组30例和对照组32例,分别在置人前及置人后12个月进行随访,观察2组累计心室起搏比例、左房内径(LAD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、血浆脑钠肽(BNP)水平及6min步行试验距离。结果术后12个月,与对照组比较,观察组LAD[(39.38±4.16)mmvs(43.41±5.34)mm]、LVEDD[(47.12±7.22)mmvs(51.76±9.26)mm]显著降低,LVEF(0.60±0.08vs0.55±0.11)升高,6min步行试验距离[(339.79±45.82)mvs(314.38±41.74)m]更长(P〈0.05),BNP水平[(108.23±62.10)ng/lvs(143.87±72.85)ng/1]显著降低(P〈0.05),累计心室起搏比例(0.21±0.08vs0.55±0.12)明显降低(P〈0.01),而房颤负荷差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论VIP功能可以明显减少累计心室起搏比例,并保护心功能。
|
关 键 词: | 心脏起搏 心室自身优先 心功能 |
Influence of ventricular intrinsic preference algorithm on the percentage of right ventricular pacing and heart function |
| |
Affiliation: | CAI Zhen-rong, LU Ming, WANG Zhi-hua, et al. Department of Cardiology, Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, China |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To investigate the impacts of ventricular intrinsic preference (VIP) algorithm on percentage of right ventricular pacing and heart function. Methods A total of 62 patients received permanent cardiac pacemaker for brady arrhythmias were enrolled. All patients were located in the right atria] appendage, ventricular electrode in the right ventricular apex; implant is turned on according to their own priorities ventricular function divided into observation group(30 cases) and control group (32 cases), before and after implantation in 12 months follow-up, two groups were observed cumulative propor- tion of ventricular pacing, left a~ial diameter (LAD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), brain natrihr~etic peptide (BNP) levels and 6 min walk test distance. Results After 12 months, compared with the control group, the observation group LAD[(39.38 ± 4. 16) mm vs. (43.41 ± 5.34) mm], LVEDD [ (47.12 ±7.22) mm vs. (51.76 ± 9.26) mm] was significantly decreased, LVEF (0.60± 0.08 vs. 0.55 ±.11) elevated, 6 min walk test distance [ (339.79 ±45.82) m vs. (314.38 ±1.74) m] was longer ( P 〈0.05), BNP levels [ (108.23±2.10) ng/L vs. (143.87 ±2.85) ng/L] decreased significantly( P 〈0.05), the cumulative percentage of ventricular pacing (0.21 ±0.08 vs. 0.55 ±0. 12) was significantly lower ( P 〈 0.01 ), and atrial fibrillation load the difference was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Ventricular intrinsic preference algorithm can effectively reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing, protect heart function. |
| |
Keywords: | Cardiac pacing Ventricular intrinsic preference Heart function |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|