首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种方法修复拇趾皮肤软组织缺损的比较
引用本文:黄东,申宽宏,吴伟炽,黄永军,牟勇. 两种方法修复拇趾皮肤软组织缺损的比较[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2012, 0(4): 330-332
作者姓名:黄东  申宽宏  吴伟炽  黄永军  牟勇
作者单位:[1]广东省第二人民医院创伤显微外科,广东广州510317 [2]南方医科大学研究牛学院,510515
摘    要:目的比较第1跖背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣和足底内侧动脉逆行岛状皮瓣修复拇趾皮肤软组织缺损的成功率和功能效果.探索和优化拇趾皮肤软组织缺损修复的技术方法。方法分别采用第1跖背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣(n=12)和足底内侧逆行岛状皮瓣(n=15)修复拇趾软组织缺损,对比两组的手术成功率和术后并发症。以足行走负重功能、皮瓣外形、颜色、抗压耐磨、皮肤感觉为参数评价和对比两组病例术后2年的疗效.结果第1跖背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣组12例全部成活,无手术并发症发生:足底内侧动脉逆行岛状皮瓣组15例发生静脉危象导致皮瓣坏死1例,皮瓣边缘部分缺血坏死造成延迟愈合1倒,无其他手术并发症:两组病例术后2年在行走负重功能、皮瓣外形、颜色方面无显著性差异.P〉0.05;皮肤感觉:两组有显著性差异,P〈O.05;抗压耐磨性:两组有显著性差异,P〈0.05。结论第1跖背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣和足底内侧动脉逆行岛状皮瓣修复拇趾软组织缺损均有较高的成功率和较低并发症发生率,前者皮肤感觉好,后者抗压耐磨性强。

关 键 词:拇趾皮肤软组织缺损  第1跖背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣  足底内侧动脉逆行岛状皮瓣  比较

Comparison of two methods in reconstruction of the great toe soft tissue defect
Affiliation:HUANG Dong, SHEN Kuan-hong, WU Wei-chi, et al (Department of Traumatic Surgery, Guangdong No.2 Provincal People's Hospital, GuangZhou, GuangDong, 510317, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the survival and functional outcomes of the reverse transplantation of the medial plantar flap and the first dorsal metatarsal artery flap used in reconstruction of the great toe soft tissue defects, in order to explore and optimize the reconstructive techniques. Methods The reverse transplantation of the medial plantar flap (n=15) and the first dorsal metatarsal artery flap (n=12) were used to repair the great toe soft tissue defects. Surgical success rate were compared between these two groups. The function of weight-bearing walking, the shape, color, feeling, compressive strength and abrasion resistance of flap were evaluated and compared between two groups 2 years after operation. Results All flaps survived in 12 cases of the first dorsal metatarsal artery flap group, without surgical complications; 1 skin island necrosis as a results of venous crisis and 1 marginal necrosis that result in wound dehiscence occurred in 15 cases of the medial plantar flap group, without other surgical complications. The function of weight-bearing walking and the flap shape and color were comparable between the two group, P 〉0.05; The feeling, compressive strength and abrasion resistance of flap were different between the two group, P 〈0.05. Conclusion Both of the reverse transplantation of the medial plantar flap and the first dorsal metatarsal artery flap are good alternative to reconstruction of the great toe soft tissue defects, with high flap survival rate and low surgical complication. The first dorsal metatarsal artery flap is good alternative for reconstruction feeling, and the other is good for compressive strength and abrasion resistance.
Keywords:Great toe soft tissue defect  The first dorsal metatarsal artery reverse flap  The medial plantar reverse flap  Comparison
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号