首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Implementation of an intravenous sotalol initiation protocol: Implications for feasibility,safety, and length of stay
Authors:Albert Y. Liu MD  Jessica Charron MSN  ACNP  Dana Fugaro MSN  Scott Spoolstra BSN  Rachel Kaplan MD  MS  Graham Lohrmann MD  Xu Gao MD  MS  Hawkins Gay MD  MPH  Rod Passman MD  MSCE  Susan Kim MD  Albert C. Lin MD  Alexandru Chicos MD  Rishi Arora MD  Kaustubha Patil MD  Anna Pfenniger MD  PhD  Bradley P. Knight MD  Nishant Verma MD  MPH
Affiliation:1. Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;2. Division of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA;3. Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
Abstract:

Introduction

Oral sotalol initiation requires a multiple-day, inpatient admission to monitor for QT prolongation during loading. A 1-day intravenous (IV) sotalol loading protocol was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in March 2020, but limited data on clinical use and administration currently exists. This study describes implementation of an IV sotalol protocol within an integrated health system, provides initial efficacy and safety outcomes, and examines length of stay (LOS) compared with oral sotalol initiation.

Methods

IV sotalol was administered according to a prespecified initiation protocol to adult patients with refractory atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline characteristics, safety and feasibility outcomes, and LOS were compared with patients receiving oral sotalol over a similar time period.

Results

From January 2021 to June 2022, a total of 29 patients (average age 66.0 ± 8.6 years, 27.6% women) underwent IV sotalol load and 20 patients (average age 60.4 ± 13.9 years, 65.0% women) underwent oral sotalol load. The load was successfully completed in 22/29 (75.9%) patients receiving IV sotalol and 20/20 (100%) of patients receiving oral sotalol, although 7/20 of the oral sotalol patients (35.0%) required dose reduction. Adverse events interrupting IV sotalol infusion included bradycardia (seven patients, 24.1%) and QT prolongation (three patients, 10.3%). No patients receiving IV or oral sotalol developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias before discharge. LOS for patients completing IV load was 2.6 days shorter (mean 1.0 vs. 3.6, p < .001) compared with LOS with oral load.

Conclusion

IV sotalol loading has a safety profile that is similar to oral sotalol. It significantly shortens hospital LOS, potentially leading to large cost savings.
Keywords:antiarrhythmic drugs  atrial fibrillation  atrial flutter  intravenous sotalol  premature ventricular contractions  quality improvement  ventricular tachycardia
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号