首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Instruments for measuring mental health recovery: A systematic review
Authors:Marisa Sklar  Erik J Groessl  Maria O'Connell  Larry Davidson  Gregory A Aarons
Institution:1. San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA 92093-0994, United States;2. Health Services Research Center, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0994, La Jolla CA 92093–0994, United States;3. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 319 Peck Street Building One, New Haven, CT 06513, United States;4. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0994, La Jolla, CA 92093-0994, United States
Abstract:Persons in recovery, providers, and policymakers alike are advocating for recovery-oriented mental health care, with the promotion of recovery becoming a prominent feature of mental health policy in the United States and internationally. One step toward creating a recovery-oriented system of care is to use recovery-oriented outcome measures. Numerous instruments have been developed to assess progress towards mental health recovery. This review identifies instruments of mental health recovery and evaluates the appropriateness of their use including their psychometric properties, ease of administration, and service-user involvement in their development. A literature search using the Medline and Psych-INFO databases was conducted, identifying 21 instruments for potential inclusion in this review, of which thirteen met inclusion criteria. Results suggest only three instruments (25%) have had their psychometric properties assessed in three or more unique samples of participants. Ease of administration varied between instruments, and for the majority of instruments, development included service user involvement. This review updates and expands previous reviews of instruments to assess mental health recovery. As mental health care continues to transform to a recovery-oriented model of service delivery, this review may facilitate selection of appropriate assessments of mental health recovery for systems to use in evaluating and improving the care they provide.
Keywords:Mental health recovery  Assessment  Review  Validity  Reliability  Service-user involvement
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号