Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after aortic valve replacement using mechanical prostheses in patients with aortic stenosis |
| |
Authors: | Koji Tsutsumi Masashi Nagumo Kuni Nishikawa Ryuichi Takahashi |
| |
Institution: | (1) Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Tochigi, Japan;(2) Present address: Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, 911-1 Takebayashi-machi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-0974, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | Background This study assessed the effects of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) using mechanical
prostheses in patients with aortic stenosis.
Methods A total of 124 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent AVR with mechanical prostheses were followed (mean 9.1 ± 4.9 years).
The patients were divided into two groups based on the effective orifice area index (EOAI): Group A did not have significant
PPM, defined as an EOAI ≥ 0.85 cm2/m2; and the PPM group had significant PPM, defined as an EOAI < 0.85 cm2/m2.
Results In all, 25 patients (20.2%) had PPM. The operative mortality was 6.1% in group A and 12.0% in the PPM group; the difference
between the groups was not significant. Moreover, the difference in overall survival rates between group A and the PPM group
was not statistically significant (15-year postoperative survival: group A 78.5% vs. PPM group 81.3%). Although there were
four late deaths in the PPM group, only one was valve-related. PPM had no effect on late survival. Postoperatively, cardiac
function and physical activity levels improved in both groups; the extent of improvement was not dependent on the presence
or severity of PPM.
Conclusion Although PPM may affect operative mortality, the effect of PPM appears to decrease over time. PPM had no effect on late survival. |
| |
Keywords: | Aortic stenosis Mechanical prosthesis Survival |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|