焦虑敏感问卷中文版的信度和效度

目的:翻译和修订焦虑敏感问卷,测试中文版的信效度。方法:翻译焦虑敏感量表,通过对中学生的三次测试,对量表的因素结构、信度和效度进行了检验。结果:修编的焦虑敏感问卷中文版通过探索性因素分析将原量表由36题缩减为15题,共包括三个因素:对生理唤醒的恐惧;对认知失控的恐惧;对社会评价的恐惧;三个因素的累积贡献率为52．29％,项目的因素负荷率在0．63～0．98之间;因素彼此之间的相关在0.37～0．53之间,因素与问卷总分之问的相关在0．72～0．84之间,因素内部的相关在0．68～0．78之间。问卷在各个因素上的内部一致性系数在0.73～0．78之间．分半信度在0．71～0．76之间,重测信度在0．70～0．78之间。结论:问卷的中文简化版在中学生中具有良好的信度和效度。

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Revision of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-Revised

Objective: To develop the Chinese version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-Revised and examine its replicability, reliability and validity. Methods: This study translated the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-Revised ( ASI-R) and examined the factor analytic structure of anxiety sensitivity in a large sample of middle school students aged 12-18 years (n = 1556) . Factor analysis of the ASI-R items resulted in a hierarchical construct with three lower-order factors loading on a single higher-order factor. Results: after revision, the number of items of the inventory reduced from 36 to 15. Anxiety sensitivity seems to be a hierarchically organized construct with one higher-order factor (anxiety sensitivity ) and three lower-order factors: Physical concern, Cognitive concern (lose of control) , Social concern, which three factors contributed to 52. 29% of total variance. Factor loadings of items were 0. 63 ~ 0. 98 , the internal correlation between items were 0. 37 ~ 0. 53 , the correlation between factors to the total score were 0. 72 ~ 0. 84, internal correlation among factors were 0. 68 ~ 0. 78. internal consistency of each factor 0. 73 ~ 0. 78. the split-half reliability was 0. 71 ~0. 76, that of test-retest was 0. 70 ~0. 78. Conclusion: The questionnaire has satisfying reliability and validity.