首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A brief assessment of object semantics in primary progressive aphasia
Authors:Bonnie L. Breining  Trisha Lala  Macarena Martínez Cuitiño  Facundo Manes  Eleni Peristeri  Kyrana Tsapkini
Affiliation:1. Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAbreining@jhu.edu;3. Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA;4. Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina;5. Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina;6. Institute of Linguistics, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina;7. UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile;8. Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Sydney, Australia;9. National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina;10. Department of English Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece;11. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Abstract:Background: A cross-culturally valid nonverbal assessment of semantic knowledge is needed. Accurately identifying impairment of object semantics is important for diagnosis of several disorders, including distinguishing semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), a neurodegenerative condition characterised by progressive impairment in word comprehension, from logopenic and nonfluent agrammatic variants, which are not associated with impaired object semantics. However, current assessments require culturally specific knowledge.

Aims: We developed a cross-culturally valid short form of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test to assess object semantic memory. We investigated its clinical utility in differentiating the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, from the logopenic and nonfluent agrammatic variants. Areas of atrophy associated with poor performance were identified.

Methods & Procedures: Fourteen items that rely on knowledge of objects’ defining features were selected from the original 52-item version. The full and short forms were administered to healthy individuals in the US (N = 18), Argentina (N = 20), and Greece (N = 12) and performance was compared. Seventy-eight individuals with primary progressive aphasia in the US completed the short form. Behavioural performance of the svPPA group (N = 24) was compared to other variants. Atlas-based analysis identified regions where atrophy correlated with poor performance in 39 individuals with primary progressive aphasia who had high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Outcomes & Results: Control performance was classified as normal on the short form significantly more often than on the full version. Across groups with primary progressive aphasia, the group with semantic variant performed significantly worse than the groups with logopenic or nonfluent agrammatic variants. Volume in left anterior and inferior temporal cortex correlated with performance.

Conclusions: The short-form Pyramids and Palm Trees Test is a clinically relevant, cross-culturally valid assessment of nonverbal object semantics. It can be used to identify semantic impairments, with poor performance associated with atrophy of the temporal lobes.
Keywords:primary progressive aphasia (PPA)  object semantics  nonverbal assessment of semantics  atlas-based analysis  cross-culturally valid assessment
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号