首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

米氮平和丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑症的对照研究
引用本文:刘晓伟,杨雀萍,曹磊明,王进良.米氮平和丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑症的对照研究[J].中国民康医学,2005,17(9):495-496.
作者姓名:刘晓伟  杨雀萍  曹磊明  王进良
作者单位:江苏省无锡市精神卫生中心,江苏,无锡,214151
摘    要:目的:比较米氮平与丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑症的疗效及不良反应。方法:将符合CCMD—Ⅲ诊断标准的64例广泛性焦虑症患者随机分为两组,分别服米氮平或丁螺环酮治疗6周,于疗前和疗后第6周末进行汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、临床疗效总评(CGI—SI)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:米氮平和丁螺环酮疗效相仿,但躯体焦虑因子分有显著性差异。两组不良反应均轻而易耐受。结论:米氮平是治疗广泛性焦虑症的安全有效药物,更适用于伴重性抑郁的广泛性焦虑症。

关 键 词:米氮平  丁螺环酮  广泛性焦虑症
文章编号:0369(2005)09-0495-02
收稿时间:01 17 2005 12:00AM
修稿时间:2005年1月17日

A comparative study between mirtazapine and buspirone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
Liu XiaoWei;Yang QiaoPing;Cao LeiMing;Wang JinLiang.A comparative study between mirtazapine and buspirone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder[J].medical journal of chinese peoples health,2005,17(9):495-496.
Authors:Liu XiaoWei;Yang QiaoPing;Cao LeiMing;Wang JinLiang
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of mirtazapine and buspirone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Methods:Sixty-four patients with generalized anxiety disorder met the criteria of CCMD-III were randomly assigned to receive mirtazapine (n=34) or buspirone (n=30). HAMA, SAS, CGI-SI and TESS were adopted to evaluate the efficacy and side effects before and after six weeks of the treatment. Results: The efficacy of mirtazapine and buspirone had no significant difference, but mirtazapine was better than buspirone in the treatment of physical anxiety patient. They had slighter side effects. Conclusions:Mirtazapine is a safe and effective drug in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, suiting for generalized anxiety disorder with major depression.
Keywords:mirtazapine  buspirone  generalized anxiety disorder
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号