首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同扫描螺距对肺内孤立性病灶GTV构建的影响
引用本文:尚东平,王俪臻,张强,于金明,尹勇.不同扫描螺距对肺内孤立性病灶GTV构建的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2017,26(12):1385-1388.
作者姓名:尚东平  王俪臻  张强  于金明  尹勇
作者单位:250117 济南,山东大学附属山东省肿瘤医院放疗科
基金项目:山东省重点研发计划项目(2015GSF118170);山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2016WS0516)
摘    要:目的 比较基于3DCT不同螺距下扫描图像构建的肺内孤立性病灶GTV大小及空间位置差异,探讨大螺距CT扫描在模拟定位中的可行性。方法 选取2014—2015年间肿瘤医院接受放疗的22例周围型肺癌或肺内孤立性转移瘤患者,根据肿瘤所在肺叶不同分为A、B组。在ABC下序贯完成常规螺距(0.938)、小螺距(0.438)及大螺距(1.188)条件下的模拟定位扫描,由同一位医生在相同的窗宽和窗位条件下勾画GTV,比较常规螺距条件下模拟定位所构建的GTVCON、小螺距条件下构建GTVS及大螺距条件下构建GTVB的大小、空间位置及匹配关系。采用Friedman M、Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果 3种螺距下构建的GTVCON、GTVS、GTVB大小分别为(11.58±16.42)、(11.63±17.73)、(12.09±17.46) cm3(P=0.11)。3种螺距下GTV中心点三维坐标比较均相近,A组Px=0.33、Py=0.81、Pz=0.39;B组Px=0.92、Py=0.05、Pz=0.37。GTVS、GTVB相对于GTVCON空间匹配指数与肿瘤所在肺叶的运动幅度有关。结论多层螺旋CT采用不同螺距模拟定位对GTV的大小及空间位置影响不大,适当增加螺距有利于提高扫描速度,缩短模拟定位时间,在肺内孤立性病灶模拟定位中具有可行性。

关 键 词:体层摄影术  X线计算机  肺肿瘤  大体肿瘤体积  螺距  
收稿时间:2016-12-20

Effect of CT pitch on the GTV delineation of solitary pulmonary lesion
Shang Dongping,Wang Lizhen,Zhang Qiang,Yu Jinmin,Yin Yong.Effect of CT pitch on the GTV delineation of solitary pulmonary lesion[J].Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology,2017,26(12):1385-1388.
Authors:Shang Dongping  Wang Lizhen  Zhang Qiang  Yu Jinmin  Yin Yong
Institution:Department of Radiation Oncology,Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University,Ji’nan 250117,China
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of pitch in three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) on the gross tumor volume (GTV) and spatial position of solitary pulmonary lesion (SPL), and to evaluate the feasibility of high-pitch 3DCT simulation for SPL. Methods Twenty-two patients with peripheral lung cancer or metastatic SPL were divided into groups A and B according to the tumor location. All patients underwent spiral CT scans at different pitches (pitchCON=0.938, pitchS=0.438, and pitchB=1.188) during free breathing. All GTVS were delineated by the same radiation oncologist using the same contouring protocol. GTVCON generated at pitchCON, GTVS generated at pitches, and GTVB generated at pitchB were compared in terms of volume and geometric position, and GTVS and GTVB were registered to GTVCON gained at the conventional pitch. The Friedman M and Wilcoxon rank-rum test were used for comparison. Results The volumes of GTVCON, GTVS, and GTVB were 11.58±16.42 cm3, 11.63±17.73 cm3, and 12.09±17.46 cm3, respectively (P=0.11). There were no significant differences in the centroid position in x, y, and z directions between GTVCON, GTVS, and GTVB (Px=0.33, Py=0.81, Pz=0.39). The same result was found in group B (Px=0.92, Py=0.05, Pz=0.37). The matching index (MI) between GTVS and GTVCON was related to the tumor location, so was the MI between GTVB and GTVCON. Conclusions The pitch in 3DCT simulation has no significant effect on the GTV and spatial position of SPL. Increasing CT pitch appropriately can improve the scanning speed and shorten the duration of 3DCT simulation, so high-pitch 3DCT simulation is feasible for SPL.
Keywords:Tomography  X-ray computed  Lung neoplasms  Gross tumor volume  Pitch  
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号