首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同骨移植材料用于种植同期GBR术式的临床比较
引用本文:郭泽清,姚江武,白冰,尤金朝.不同骨移植材料用于种植同期GBR术式的临床比较[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2013(10):614-615.
作者姓名:郭泽清  姚江武  白冰  尤金朝
作者单位:厦门市口腔医院,福建厦门361000
摘    要:目的:比较不同骨移植材料在种植同期行膜引导骨冉生(GBR)手术式的临床效果。方法:69例单牙缺失的种植修复病例,根据骨移楠材料的不同分为3组:A组采用人工骨;B组采用人工骨与自体骨混合;C组为自体骨。常规完成种植删期GBR手术式,6个月后再次翻瓣,比较其骨移植临床效果。结果:A组20例中有5例发生移植骨未格合机体暴露,B组25例中有2例发生移植骨未整合植体暴露,C组24例中有3例发生移植骨术整介植体暴露。经统计学分析,三组骨移植临床效果差异无统计学意义。结论:临床观察,三种骨移植材料GBR于术式短期内骨移植临床效果无明显差异。

关 键 词:胃移植材料  骨缺损  种植刚期GBR

The clinical study of different bone filler in the implant placement with simultaneous GBR.
GUO Ze-qing,YA,Jiang-wu,BA,Bing,YOU Jin-zhao.The clinical study of different bone filler in the implant placement with simultaneous GBR.[J].Journal of Clinical Stomatology,2013(10):614-615.
Authors:GUO Ze-qing  YA  Jiang-wu  BA  Bing  YOU Jin-zhao
Institution:.( The Xiamen Dental Hospitcd, Fujian Xiamen 361000,China)
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical results using different types of the bone fillers in the implant placement with simuhaneous GBR. nethod:A total of 69 single implant teeth were chosen and divided into 3 groups:Group A,alloplastic bone substitutes;Group B,Combination with autogenous bone and alloplastic substitutes;Group C,with autogenous bone. Re- suits were analyzed statistically SPSS. Result:There was not a statistically significant difference among them. Conclusion:Ac- cording to the study three types of bone filler all have good clinical results.
Keywords:bone grafts and bone substitute materials  bone defect  implant placement with simultaneous GBR
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号