首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Quality Indicators for Geriatric Emergency Care
Authors:Kevin M. Terrell  DO  MS    Fredric M. Hustey  MD    Ula Hwang  MD  MPH    Lowell W. Gerson  PhD    Neil S. Wenger  MD  MPH     Douglas K. Miller  MD
Affiliation:From the Department of Emergency Medicine (KMT), the Indiana University Center for Aging Research (KMT, DKM), and the Regenstrief Institute (KMT, DKM), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;the Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (FMH);the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, the Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Veterans Administration Medical Center, Bronx, NY (UH);the Department of Community Health Sciences, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron, OH (LWG);and the Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (NSW).
Abstract:Objectives:  Emergency departments (EDs), similar to other health care environments, are concerned with improving the quality of patient care. Older patients comprise a large, growing, and particularly vulnerable subset of ED users. The project objective was to develop ED-specific quality indicators for older patients to help practitioners identify quality gaps and focus quality improvement efforts.
Methods:  The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Geriatric Task Force, including members representing the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), selected three conditions where there are quality gaps in the care of older patients: cognitive assessment, pain management, and transitional care in both directions between nursing homes and EDs. For each condition, a content expert created potential quality indicators based on a systematic review of the literature, supplemented with expert opinion when necessary. The original candidate quality indicators were modified in response to evaluation by four groups: the Task Force, the SAEM Geriatric Interest Group, and audiences at the 2007 SAEM Annual Meeting and the 2008 American Geriatrics Society Annual Meeting.
Results:  The authors offer 6 quality indicators for cognitive assessment, 6 for pain management, and 11 for transitions between nursing homes and EDs.
Conclusions:  These quality indicators will help researchers and clinicians target quality improvement efforts. The next steps will be to test the feasibility of capturing the quality indicators in existing medical records and to measure the extent to which each quality indicator is successfully met in current emergency practice.
Keywords:emergency medical services    emergency service    hospital    geriatrics    health services for the aged    quality indicators    health care    quality of health care
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号