首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

莫西沙星与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦钠治疗社区获得性肺炎的最小成本分析
引用本文:许建国,朱华,姜正华.莫西沙星与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦钠治疗社区获得性肺炎的最小成本分析[J].中国药房,2009(32):2483-2485.
作者姓名:许建国  朱华  姜正华
作者单位:江苏省苏北人民医院,扬州市225001
摘    要:目的:评价注射用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦钠与莫西沙星注射液治疗社区获得性肺炎的经济学效果。方法:采用随机分组的研究方法,选择92例社区获得性肺炎患者,分别给予注射用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦钠(A组)、莫西沙星注射液(B组)治疗。观察2组的临床疗效、安全性,并进行药物经济学分析。结果:A组与B组有效率分别为86.00%、92.86%(P>0.05),平均成本分别为1314.8、3306.5元(P<0.05)。结论:A组方案较经济。

关 键 词:社区获得性肺炎  头孢哌酮/舒巴坦钠  莫西沙星  最小成本分析

Cost- Minimization Analysis of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Sodium vs. Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia
XU Jian-guo,ZHU Hua,JIANG Zheng-hua.Cost- Minimization Analysis of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Sodium vs. Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia[J].China Pharmacy,2009(32):2483-2485.
Authors:XU Jian-guo  ZHU Hua  JIANG Zheng-hua
Institution:(Subei People' s Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, China)
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic effects of cefoperazone/ sulbactam sodium and moxifloxacin for community acquired pneumonia. METHODS: 92 patients with community acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive eefoperazone/ sulbaetam sodium for injection(Group A) or moxifloxacin injection(Group B), respectively. In both groups the observation of curative effects and safety and the pharmacoeconomic analysis were conducted. RESULTS: The effective rates of two groups were 86.00% and 92.86% (P 〉0.05), respectively. The average cost was 1314.8 yuan in Group A versus 3 306.5 yuan in Group B(P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSION: The therapy of Group A is more benefit between two groups.
Keywords:Community acquired pneumonia  Cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium  Moxifloxacin  Cost - minimization analysis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号