| 动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的临床应用比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张金顺,方爱武,彭寿雄,周业辉,潘伟华,王玉宏,王勤美. 动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的临床应用比较[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志, 2007, 25(2): 163-164 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张金顺 方爱武 彭寿雄 周业辉 潘伟华 王玉宏 王勤美 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 温州,温州医学院附属眼视光医院青光眼病区
2. 中山大学中山眼科中心 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的了解动态轮廓眼压计的临床实用性。方法67例患者134眼随即先后用动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计进行眼压测量,比较两种眼压计测量值的差异。结果134眼中,用Goldmann压平眼压计测量的眼压平均值为(15.82±-4.88)mmHg,用动态轮廓眼压计测量的眼压平均值为(14.5±-4.33)mmHg,;两者无明显差异。但73%的患者的动态轮廓眼压计的眼压值高于Goldmann压平眼压计的测量值。两者的相关性为0.83。结论动态轮廓眼压计可以较好的反映患者的眼压,操作简便,值得推广应用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 眼压 动态轮廓眼压计 Goldmann压平眼压计 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-06-01 |
Clinical Comparison of the Dynamic Contour Tonometry to the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
| |
| ZHANG Jing-sun, FANG Ai-wu, PEING Shou-xiong,et al.. Clinical Comparison of the Dynamic Contour Tonometry to the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology, 2007, 25(2): 163-164 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Jing-sun FANG Ai-wu PEING Shou-xiong et al. |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Jing-sun, FANG Ai-wu, PEING Shou-xiong, et al. |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) with the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry(GAT) in healthy subject.s. Methods 67 case (134 eyes) were random measured In- traocular Pressure (IOP) with the DCT and the GAT. Result In 134 eyes, The average IOP measured by GAT were 14.5 /-4.33mmHg, measured by DCT were 15.82 /-4.88mmHg, But 73% IOP of DCT were higher than GAT . The correlation coefficient between the IOP of two instruments was 0.83. Conclusion DCT can accu- racy measure IOP of patients, easy to operate. It is valuable to be applied to clinical. |
| |
| Keywords: | Intraocular pressure Dynamic Contour Tonometry Goldmann Applanation Tonom- etry |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
