Obstetric interventions for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes |
| |
Authors: | Tim Cundy,Joanna Morgan,Claire O&rsquo Beirne,Greg Gamble,Astrid Budden,Valeria Ivanova,Mairi Wallace |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;2. Diabetes Pregnancy Clinic, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveTo determine whether differences exist in the rates of obstetric intervention between women with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes, and whether there has been any change in cesarean rates over time, paralleling that seen in the general obstetric population.MethodsData were examined from a prospectively collected series on the outcomes of 1030 deliveries (382 by women with type 1 diabetes, 648 by women with type 2 diabetes) from 1988 to 2008.ResultsThere was a secular trend to increasing maternal age (type 1, P < 0.003; type 2, P < 0.03). Intervention rates (induction of labor or elective cesarean) did not differ between type 1 (88%) and type 2 (85%) diabetes. The overall cesarean rate was 52%–55% with no secular trend. Poorer glycemic control in early pregnancy and primiparity were associated with primary cesarean in both groups. In women with type 1 diabetes, greater maternal obesity and retinopathy were also associated with primary cesarean.ConclusionIntervention rates are high in pregnancies among women with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes but they have not changed significantly. Secular trends toward increasing maternal age and obesity suggest that intervention rates are unlikely to decrease in the near future. |
| |
Keywords: | Cesarean delivery Induction of labor Secular trends Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|