首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Processes and dynamics of linkage to care from mobile/outreach and facility-based HIV testing models in hard-to-reach settings in rural Tanzania. Qualitative findings of a mixed methods study
Authors:Erica S. Sanga,Ferdinand C. Mukumbang  author-information"  >,Adiel K. Mushi,Willyhelmina Olomi,Wondwossen Lerebo,Christina Zarowsky
Affiliation:1.NIMR-Mwanza Medical Research Centre (MMRC),Mwanza,Tanzania;2.School of Public Health,University of Western Cape,Cape Town,South Africa;3.School of Public Health,Mekelle University,Mekelle,Ethiopia;4.National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR),Dar-es-Salaam,Tanzania;5.University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre and School of Public Health,Université de Montréal,Montreal,Canada;6.Department of Public Health,Institute of Tropical Medicine,Antwerp,Belgium;7.NIMR-Mbeya Medical Research Centre (MMRC),Mbeya,Tanzania
Abstract:

Background

Like other countries, Tanzania instituted mobile and outreach testing approaches to address low HIV testing rates at health facilities and enhance linkage to care. Available evidence from hard-to-reach rural settings of Mbeya region, Tanzania suggests that clients testing HIV+?at facility-based sites are more likely to link to care, and to link sooner, than those testing at mobile sites. This paper (1) describes the populations accessing HIV testing at mobile/outreach and facility-based testing sites, and (2) compares processes and dynamics from testing to linkage to care between these two testing models from the same study context.

Methods

An explanatory sequential mixed-method study (a) reviewed records of all clients (n?=?11,773) testing at 8 mobile and 8 facility-based testing sites over 6 months; (b), reviewed guidelines; (c) observed HIV testing sites (n?=?10) and Care and Treatment Centers (CTCs) (n?=?8); (d) applied questionnaires at 0, 3 and 6 months to a cohort of 1012 HIV newly-diagnosed clients from the 16 sites; and (e) conducted focus group discussions (n?=?8) and in-depth qualitative interviews with cohort members (n?=?10) and health care providers (n?=?20).

Results

More clients tested at mobile/outreach than facility-based sites (56% vs 44% of 11,733, p?

Conclusions

Rural mobile/outreach HIV testing sites reach more people than facility based sites but they reach a different clientèle which is less likely to be HIV +ve and appears to be less “linkage-ready”. Despite more proactive care and confidentiality at mobile sites, linkage to care is worse than for clients who tested at facility-based sites. Our findings highlight a combination of (a) patient-level factors, including stigma; and (b) well-established procedures and routines for each step between testing and initiation of treatment in facility-based sites. Long waiting times at treatment sites are a further barrier that must be addressed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号