ANALYSIS ON THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF 46 CASES OF PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER TREATED BY NEEDLING JIANSANZHEN WITH MAGNETIC POLE NEEDLE AND MASSAGE

In the present paper,46 cases of periarthritis of shoulder were treated by needlingthe Jiansanzhen with magnetic pole needle and massage. Among them,43 cases were cured, ac-counting for 93. 48% and 46 were effective. The total effective rate was 100%. In control groupI there were 23 cases, who received treatment of acupuncture with traditional stainless-steel fili-form needle and massage, the total effective rate was 91. 3%. Comparison of the therapeutic ef-fects between the two groups showed X~2=4. 12, P<0.05. In control group II there were 23 cas-es, who received needling Tiaokou point (ST 38)-through-Chengshan (BL 57) with the abovementioned stainless-steel filiform, one of ancient and modern experimental methods, the total ef-fecive rate was 82. 6%, which was compared with that in the treatment group, indicating X~2=8.492, P<0. 01. It is suggested that the therapeutic effect in the treatment group was superior tothat in the control group I and significantly superior to that in the control group II. T

ANALYSIS ON THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF 46 CASES OF PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER TREATED BY NEEDLING JIANSANZHEN WITH MAGNETIC POLE NEEDLE AND MASSAGE

In the present paper,46 cases of periarthritis of shoulder were treated by needling the Jiansanzhen with magnetic pole needle and massage. Among them,43 cases were cured, accounting for 93. 48% and 46 were effective. The total effective rate was 100%. In control group I there were 23 cases, who received treatment of acupuncture with traditional stainless-steel filiform needle and massage, the total effective rate was 91. 3%. Comparison of the therapeutic effects between the two groups showed X2 = 4. 12, P<0. 05. In control group II there were 23 cases, who received needling Tiaokou point (ST 38)-through-Chengshan (BL 57) with the above mentioned stainless-steel filiform, one of ancient and modern experimental methods, the total ef-fecive rate was 82. 6% , which was compared with that in the treatment group, indicating X2 = 8. 492, P<0. 01. It is suggested that the therapeutic effect in the treatment group was superior to that in the control group I and significantly superior to that in the control group II. The two methods in the control group I and the control group II are still one of effective methods treating this disease at present.