Usefulness of both operative cholangiography and conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background/Purpose We evaluated the role of operative cholangiography and of conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries.Methods We report 1074 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, out of a total of 1195 patients who underwent laparoscopy, over an 8-year period. The planned laparoscopic operative procedure in all the patients was the standard four-port technique with the operator on the left side of the patient. Operative cholangiography was performed with Olsens pliers.Results We performed 993 (83%) operative cholangiographies; 121 (10.1%) patients were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Despite a prolonged time of dissection, 54 (4.5%) patients were converted because of unclear anatomy of Calots triangle. One hundred and ninety patients suffered acute cholecystitis and, of those, 52 (27.3% of 190 patients) were converted. Fifteen patients showed intraoperative biliary duct stones and they were converted. Seven (0.58%) bile duct injuries (one stricture and six fistulas) are reported.Conclusions The low number of major bile duct injuries reported in our study showed the value of operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, another important factor found to reduce major bile duct injuries was conversion when, despite accurate dissection, the anatomy of Calots triangle remained unclear.Presented at the poster session of the 103rd Congress of The Japan Surgical Society, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, June 2003, and published in abstract form in the Journal of the Japan Surgical Society (2003) 104: 1072–1073 (data-related years 1993–2000).