首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

动态稳定与融合治疗单节段退行性腰椎滑脱比较
引用本文:牟遐平,戢勇,许建中,张劲松. 动态稳定与融合治疗单节段退行性腰椎滑脱比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 0(1): 11-16
作者姓名:牟遐平  戢勇  许建中  张劲松
作者单位:四川省简阳市人民医院骨科;陆军军医大学西南医院骨科
摘    要:[目的]前瞻性对比分析Dynesys动态稳定与融合治疗单节段退行性腰椎滑脱的临床疗效.[方法]2013年1月-2016年6月46例单节段退行性腰椎滑脱患者随机分为两组,其中,22例采用Dynesys动态稳定(Dynesys组),24例采用后路融合固定(PLIF组).比较两组围手术期、随访期及影像学资料.[结果]两组患者...

关 键 词:退行性腰椎滑脱  Dynesys  动态稳定  固定融合

Dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
MU Xia-ping,JI Yong,XU Jian-zhong,ZHANG Jinsong. Dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China, 2022, 0(1): 11-16
Authors:MU Xia-ping  JI Yong  XU Jian-zhong  ZHANG Jinsong
Affiliation:(Department of Orthopedics,Sichuan Jianyang People's Hospital,Jianyang 641400,China;Department of Orthopedics,Southwest Hospital,Army Military Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China)
Abstract:[Objective]To prospectively compare the clinical efficacy of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus intrumented fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.[Methods]From January 2013 to June 2016,a total of 46 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into two groups.Of them,22 patients were treated with Dynesys dynamic stabilization(the Dynesys group),while the other 24 patients were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion(the PLIF group).The perioperative,follow-up and imaging documents were compared between the two groups.[Results]All the patients in both groups had operation completed smoothly.The Dynesys group was significantly superior to the PLIF group in terms of operation time,intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay(P<0.05).All patients were followed up for 18-40 months,with a mean of(25.47±6.69)months.Both VAS and ODI scores in the two groups significantly decreased at the latest follow-up compared with those preoperatively(P<0.05).However,at corresponding time points the Dynesys group was slightly superior to the PLIF group in VAS and ODI scores,despite of the fact that no statistically significant differences were noted between them(P>0.05).Radiographically,although there were no significant changes in the involved disc height and adjacent disc height(P>0.05),the ROMs of affected segment and the whole lumbar spine decreased significantly,while ROM of the adjacent segment increased significantly at the latest follow-up in both groups compared with those before operation(P<0.05).The Dynesys group had significantly greater overall lumbar ROM than the PLIF group at the last interview(P<0.05),addi-tionally,the former proved significantly superior to the latter in term of adjacent segment degeneration by using UCLA scale(P<0.05).[Conclusion]Both dynamic stabilization and instrumented fusion achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.By contrast,the former retains more segment motion,significantly reduce the incidence of radiographic degeneration of adjacent segments,and has the advantages of less bleeding,less trauma and shorter hospital stay.
Keywords:degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis  Dynesys  dynamic stabilization  instrumented fusion
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号