Assesment of the compressive strength of the current restorative materials |
| |
| Authors: | Sinem Birant Hazal Ozcan Mine Koruyucu Figen Seymen |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Istanbul University-Cerrahpa?a, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey;2. Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey;1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia;2. Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia;3. Department of Forensic Odontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia;4. Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRS 1138, Molecular Oral Pathophysiology, Paris 75006, France;1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;2. Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry / Special Needs Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan;2. Department of Gerodontology and Oral Rehabilitation, Division of Gerontology and Gerodontology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan;1. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Harran University, 63300, Haliliye, Sanliurfa, Turkey;2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Harran University, 63300, Haliliye, Sanliurfa, Turkey |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the compressive strength of the 6 different restorative materials which are frequently used today by using the universal compressive strength test.Materials and methodA total of 60 specimens were prepared as 10 samples in each group for compressive strength test. Group A: G-aenial Posterior Composite Group B: Equia Fil, Group C: Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk Fill, Group D: Glass Fill, Group E: Filtek? Bulk Fill, Group F: SureFil SDR Bulk Fill. The compressive strength test was performed at a speed of 1.00 ± 0.05 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens using a computerized universal test device (Autograph AG-IS; Shimadzu Co, Kyoto, Japan). One Way Anova and Tukey HSD test were used for the statistically analysis.ResultsThe analysis of the obtained data revealed that the highest compressive strength was found in Group F and the lowest compressive strength in Group C and D. The compressive strength of Group F was significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.01). The compressive strength of Group E was significantly higher than all other groups except Group F (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe use of bulk fill composites in pediatric dentistry provides convenience by shortening the process steps. Thanks to their mechanical properties, they are used in treatment options instead of conventional composite restorations. |
| |
| Keywords: | Compressive strength SDR Bulk fill composite |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
