| DF和DPE方案治疗晚期食管癌78例疗效分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李向德,马峰,张德州,丁金亮,王秀荣,许云丽,任清宇.DF和DPE方案治疗晚期食管癌78例疗效分析[J].肿瘤基础与临床,1997(6). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李向德 马峰 张德州 丁金亮 王秀荣 许云丽 任清宇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 解放军第371医院肿瘤科 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 1995年5月至1995年8月我们采用DF和DPE方案，分别治疗中晚期食管癌42例和36例。DF组的缓解率为61．9％（26／42），其中完全缓解16．7％；DPE组的缓解率为47．2％（17／36），完全缓解5．6％。两组缓解率差异无显著性（P＞0．05）。DF的恶心呕吐为85．7％，肾脏毒性9．5％，DPE方案的恶心呕吐为80．6％，肾毒性5．5％。
|
| 关 键 词： | DF和DPE方案 食管肿瘤 联合化疗 |
An Analysis of Therapeutic Effects on DF and DPE Regimens in the Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Cancer |
| |
| Li Xiangde, Ma Feng, Zhang Dezhuo et al.An Analysis of Therapeutic Effects on DF and DPE Regimens in the Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Cancer[J].journal of basic and clinical oncology,1997(6). |
| |
| Authors: | Li Xiangde Ma Feng Zhang Dezhuo |
| |
| Abstract: | Forty- Two cases of advanced esophageal cancer were treated with DF regimen and 36 cases with DPE regimen our hospital from May 1993 to August 1995.The response rate to DF regimen was 61.9%(26/4), and its complete remission rate was 16.7% .The response rate to DPE regimen was 47.2%(17/36), and its complete remission rate was 5.6%. There was no significant difference between the two regimens(P>0.05) .The side effects of nausea and vomitting and nephrotoxicity in DF regimen were 85.7% and 9.5%;while in DPE regimen were 80.6% and 5.6% respectively. |
| |
| Keywords: | DF and DPE regimens esophageal cancer combined chemotherapy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
